US envoy heads to Afghanistan, Qatar for peace negotiations

Zalmay Khalilzad hopes to iron out a deal that can end nearly 18 years of military intervention


Afp July 23, 2019
United States Special Envoy for Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad. PHOTO: REUTERS

WASHINGTON: The United States peace envoy is en route to Afghanistan and then Qatar to resume negotiations with the Taliban and iron out a deal that could end nearly 18 years of military intervention, the State Department said on Monday.

Special Representative Zalmay Khalilzad left on Monday for the mission lasting through August 1 "as part of an overall effort to facilitate a peace process that ends the conflict in Afghanistan," the State Department said in a statement.

‘Substantial progress’ made in Afghan talks, US envoy tells Pakistan

In the capital Kabul, he will discuss with the Afghan government the "next steps in the peace process, including identifying a national negotiating team that can participate in intra-Afghan negotiations," the statement added.

Forming such a team is a fraught issue as the Taliban refuse to negotiate directly with the Afghan government.

Khalilzad will then travel to Doha, where "he will resume talks with the Taliban," the State Department said.

Washington is hoping for a political agreement with the insurgents ahead of the Afghan presidential election scheduled for late September.

Taliban kill 26 pro-government militia men in Afghanistan

A breakthrough could pave the way for a withdrawal of international troops some 18 years after the 9/11 attacks, which led the US to launch a massive offensive to dislodge the Taliban government from Kabul.

The US negotiator has had several meetings with the Taliban in the past year, the most recent being on July 9 in Doha.

Earlier, the Taliban and other senior Afghan officials held intra-Afghan talks in the Qatari capital, pledging to deliver a "road map for peace" in Afghanistan.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ