Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's marriage is reportedly facing challenges, with experts suggesting they are on different pages regarding their Royal Family past.
Speaking to the Mirror, royal author Tom Quinn notes Meghan's apparent forward momentum, "Meghan appears to have moved on...she has far more to focus on in the States." However, he points out that Prince Harry seems more fixated on past grievances, implying he has less to occupy his time in the US.
Relationship expert Louella Alderson echoes these sentiments, noting that Prince Harry's emotional ties to his Royal Family background contrast with Meghan's American upbringing. Alderson suggests their divergent priorities could strain their marriage, especially given their substantial time apart due to individual commitments.
Louella told the Mirror, "This statement does suggest that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle may be focused on different priorities and may not be aligned in their goals and aspirations at the moment. It's possible that these differences could create tension or challenges in their marriage, especially if they continue to spend significant amounts of time apart due to their individual commitments.
"Given Harry was born into the Royal Family in Britain, it's understandable that he would have a strong emotional attachment to his past as part of the Royal Family. On the other hand, Meghan was born and raised in America and it would feel more like home to her and so it makes sense that she has an easier time moving on from their time as working members of the Royal Family and is focused on her opportunities in the US."
These insights from Alderson and Quinn come amidst ongoing speculation about the state of Prince Harry and Meghan's relationship. They highlight the complexities the couple faces as they navigate diverging paths within and beyond the Royal Family, underscoring the need for open communication and mutual understanding in overcoming these challenges.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ