Cost of living: Minimum wage inadequate to meet basic needs, says SC

Top court seeks comprehensive survey of flour prices.


Hasnaat Malik April 23, 2014
Minimum wage inadequate to meet basic needs, says SC. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD:


The Supreme Court has observed that the fundamental rights to life as given in Article 9 and a life of dignity as envisioned under Article 14 of the Constitution are not available to a substantial number of citizens throughout the country.


At the last hearing, the court had constituted four committees, comprising the federal and provincial governments’ law officers, to check the price and availability of wheat flour on-spot throughout the country.

“The committees have made visits to various sites. From their reports, it does appear that the fundamental rights to life as given in Article 9 and a life of dignity as envisioned under Article 14 of the Constitution may not be available presently to a substantial number of citizens,” a two-judge bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Jawwad S Khawaja, observed on Tuesday.



The bench observed that it is necessary that a more comprehensive survey is conducted by qualified professionals or institutions to evaluate the price and availability of flour throughout the country.

“We will also consider the possibility of seeking a study by professionally or scientifically sound bodies or individuals to assist us in understanding if and to what extent, there may be deficiency in assuring the fundamental rights of the citizens,” the court order says.

The court said that it would be appropriate if it could have empirical data so that further proceedings and orders are grounded in facts which have been validated.

The bench also rejected the federal government’s data as to how a family comprising two adults and two minors would be able to survive with dignity as per Article 14 of the Constitution with the minimum wage of an unskilled worker.



During the hearing, Food Security Commissioner Dr Shakeel Ahmed Khan submitted the data gathered by the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics regarding the matter.

According to the data, the price of essential food items per month has been given as Rs5,530, Rs6,200 and Rs14, 858.

The bench said the data was outdated and the figures do not consider the needs of such family in respect of electricity, water, gas, transport, school fees, clothing, shelter and a number of other items. It said that the federal and provincial governments are charged with the responsibility of ensuring that the fundamental rights of the citizens of the state are met.

“Even amongst the principles of policy, it has been stipulated in Article 38(a) of the Constitution that the state shall secure the well-being of the people. We are listing this petition for hearing during the next week on which date the governments shall be heard and their actions to alleviate the abject condition of the citizens will be taken into account,” the court said in its order.

During the hearing, Additional Attorney General Atiq Shah submitted that flour is being smuggled from Balochistan into Afghanistan. Justice Jawwad S Khawaja said that if so, this is a failure on the part of the executive. The hearing of the case is adjourned until May 2.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 23rd, 2014.

COMMENTS (2)

Badr Siddiqui | 7 years ago | Reply

@aphtab absolutely correct, and additionally, increasing the wages will also result in increase in demand since people will have more buying power resulting in demand push inflation further increasing the prices of necessities. This increase would further on level itself at the point when they are once again not affordable to people earning the minimum wage.

The solution is not increasing wages or subsidies but increasing the national output by investing in modernization of farming methods and educating the masses so that they can make a better living for themselves.

The so called bearers of justice are just a bunch of loonies crammed together to follow their whimsical objectives which may seem so but are not in in the national interest. Using their coveted positions for cheap publicity to play on the minds of the poor and ignorant.

aphtab | 7 years ago | Reply

Ever heard of the terms supply and demand and market forces. Unless subsidized by the government, the prices of food stuff will be determined by supply and demand. The demand will remain strong as long as people have the capacity to buy at higher prices. Government subsidy is not advised because the benefit does to reach the target segments of the society and is a drain on the countries economy. Fixing of minimum wage is counterproductive; the employer will reduce workforce to mitigate the cost impact resulting in unemployment and encourages poor performance. Its a cheap popularity stunt to show concern where no amount of intervention will help.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read