Next move: Musharraf’s legal team to file appeal in SC today

"Musharraf is relaxed and confident at his residence in Chak Shahzad, sipping coffee and smoking cigars,” says...


Zahid Gishkori April 18, 2013
“The appeal will seek both bail and the exclusion of terror charges added by the IHC against the former president,” says Musharraf’s counsel. PHOTO: AFP

ISLAMABAD:


General (retd) Pervez Musharraf’s counsel Ahmed Raza Kasuri said an appeal will be filed in the Supreme Court today (Friday) over the Islamabad High Court’s order to arrest the former president.


“The appeal will seek both bail and the exclusion of terror charges added by the IHC against the former president,” he added.

Another of Musharraf’s counsels, advocate Ibrahim Satti said: “We will seek pre-arrest bail in the judges’ detention case and ask for quashing of Islamabad High Court’s order to arrest him.”

Kasuri said his client expected that the Supreme Court, without prejudice, will immediately grant necessary relief following precedence and the rule of law.”

“He [Musharraf] is relaxed and confident at his residence in Chak Shahzad, sipping coffee and smoking cigars,” Kasuri claimed. Party leaders also had a long briefing with Musharraf and exchanged views on his bail cancellation, the counsel said.

Such decisions, Kasuri said, could ignite fresh tussles among various state institutions like the army, judiciary and caretaker government.

“But we want justice no matter what Musharraf did in the past,” he added.

Separately, the Islamabad High Court’s cancellation of General (retd) Pervez Musharraf’s bail application in the judges’ detention case and arrest order was termed as “ill-conceived” by the All Pakistan Muslim League.

Senior APML leader Dr Muhammad Amjad said that the former president will continue to face the courts. “Musharraf is ready for jail, if the Supreme Court rejects his appeal,” he said and explained that “if an arrest is necessary then authorities will declare Musharraf’s farmhouse a sub-jail.”

Amjad stated that Musharraf did not run away from the IHC, adding there were no police officials to arrest him and nobody tried to do so.

Interior, law and justice ministries remain silent

Meanwhile, the ministries of interior and law and justice were tight-lipped over the matter as it was still unclear if and when Musharraf could be arrested. Interior Secretary Sadiq-e-Akbar and caretaker Law Minister Ahmer Bilal did not comment on the issue despite holding several meetings to discuss legal and security related issues.

“Officials are perplexed as to what to do now and how to deal with Musharraf’s arrest issue,” said a senior official of the interior ministry.

He told The Express Tribune that Musharraf’s security detail had been enhanced given the threats he was facing. A special squad of paramilitary forces will patrol his Chak Shahzad residence.

However, caretaker Information Minister Arif Nizami said that the government would obey the decisions of the court. “Court orders to arrest Musharraf will be followed, come what may,” he said.


Published in The Express Tribune, April 19th, 2013.

Our Publications

COMMENTS (6)

syed munawar abid adv | 8 years ago | Reply

allegdly, high treason act was committed by former president, pervaiz musharraf but the question is that the supreme court act of velidation could be considered as abetment for the act committed. or the same after being legalised ccannot be reopened.

Ashfaq | 8 years ago | Reply

The rule of law always prevail in the civilized country, however in Pakistan the laws of the land only applies to the general public and not the so called elite. It is a sad and shameful day for Pakistani nation when the police officers who have taken oath to defend the law of the land and constitution just stood by and let him go. Musharraf should have the decency to obey the court and set an example for the future generations. I have no sympathy for him now and he should be uncreated no matter what and prevail the judgment of court. I don’t think the Supreme of Pakistan should take this episode lightly and decide judicially what is good for the country’s law and order.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ