Missing persons case: SC orders authorities to present details in next hearing

Chief justice says officers not yielding results in missing persons' cases should be changed.


Web Desk September 06, 2012
Missing persons case: SC orders authorities to present details in next hearing

QUETTA: Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry while hearing the missing persons' case, ordered the Inspector General (IG) Frontier Corps (FC), interior secretary, defence secretary and IG Police to present the final report on missing persons in the next hearing, Express News reported on Thursday.

The chief justice made these remarks while hearing the Balochistan security situation case and missing persons' case in the Supreme Court’s Quetta Registry.

Displeased over the forces’ failure to recover a boy kidnapped 20 days ago from Pishin, the chief justice criticised security forces and remarked that officers who were not yielding results be changed.

Justice Chaudhry, irked at the chief secretary, interior secretary and the deputy commissioner of Pishin, remarked that chief secretary should have policy in every district, to which the chief secretary replied saying they were in contact with agencies and the boy would be recovered by evening.

Earlier, Justice Chaudhry told the Inspector General of Frontier Corps (IGFC) and the Balochistan chief secretary to admit they had failed in the province, adding that the governor would be summoned once they had done so.

COMMENTS (8)

Naeem | 12 years ago | Reply Unless and until these institutions are corralled and made answerable to the representatives of the people in the NA and PAs, Pakistan will be sliding toward implosion. I wonder some time if even God could help Pakistan out of this mess.
Aslai Nasli Chaudry | 12 years ago | Reply

@salahudin: R u talking about a man who is creating case against Pakistan for the UN sponcered by the enemies of Pakistan.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ