TODAY’S PAPER | April 21, 2026 | EPAPER

Pakistan, China unveil 5-point Gulf peace plan

Jointly call for ceasefire, peace talks; urge civilian protection, safe shipping as Beijing eyes larger Middle East


Kamran Yousaf April 01, 2026 4 min read
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi met with Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar in Beijing on March 31, 2026. Courtesy: CGTN

ISLAMABAD:

Pakistan and China on Tuesday jointly proposed a five-point initiative aimed at restoring peace and stability in the Gulf and the broader Middle East.

The plan calls for an immediate ceasefire, urgent diplomatic engagement to prevent further escalation, and the restoration of normal maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.

The 'Five-Point Plan' was announced in a joint statement following a meeting in Beijing between China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Senator Ishaq Dar.

Dar travelled to China two days after hosting a meeting of foreign ministers from Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt as part of Pakistan's diplomatic efforts to end the conflict. China's endorsement of the plan highlights Beijing's increasingly proactive role in seeking a resolution to the crisis.

The plan

According to the joint statement, both sides stressed the need for an immediate cessation of hostilities, urging all parties to prevent the conflict from spreading and to ensure unhindered humanitarian access to war-affected areas.

They also called for the early resumption of peace talks, underlining that dialogue and diplomacy remain the only viable paths to resolving disputes. The statement emphasised the importance of safeguarding the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and security of Iran and the Gulf states, while urging all parties to refrain from the use or threat of force during negotiations.

Highlighting concerns over civilian safety, the two countries underscored the need to protect non-military targets. They called on all parties to strictly adhere to international humanitarian law and halt attacks on civilians and critical infrastructure, including energy facilities, desalination plants, and peaceful nuclear installations.

They also voiced concern over disruptions to global trade, stressing the need to ensure the security of shipping lanes, particularly in the Strait of Hormuz. They called for the safe passage of commercial vessels and the restoration of normal maritime traffic at the earliest opportunity.

Reaffirming their commitment to multilateralism, both countries emphasised the primacy of the United Nations Charter, urging the international community to support efforts aimed at achieving a comprehensive and lasting peace framework in line with international law.

China's pivotal role

The Foreign Office in Islamabad stated that the initiative reflects a shared commitment by Islamabad and Beijing to promote de-escalation in a region facing heightened tensions. Diplomatic sources suggested that China could play a pivotal role in nudging Iran toward potential face-to-face talks with the US in Islamabad.

Dar's visit to Beijing gained significant traction among domestic and international commentators. Analysts noted that the joint statement proves Pakistan and China are "on the same page" regarding the crisis.

"The upshot of the China-Pakistan five-point statement on the war is that China's answer to being asked to get involved was definitely not 'no.' The statement is an opening for Beijing to step in," wrote Vali Nasr, Professor at Johns Hopkins and author of 'Iran's Grand Strategy', on X.

Geo-strategy expert Professor Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed noted that the statement aligns closely with the Gulf's interests. "By placing a ceasefire first, Beijing and Islamabad align with Gulf preferences and create a baseline that others can publicly support, even if not immediately implemented," he said.

Dr Ahmed added that the most "consequential point" involves the Strait of Hormuz: "By focusing on safe passage and normal shipping, the proposal links the conflict to global energy markets. It aligns with US, Chinese, and Gulf interests and creates a clear area where pressure for restraint can build quickly."

Former finance minister Asad Umar described the proposal on X as an "excellent development," noting it marks the first time China has taken a direct initiative to influence a global crisis of this magnitude. Quoting Allama Iqbal, he added: "See the sun rising from the East."

Michael Kugelman, a prominent American foreign policy expert, said the initiative signals Beijing's endorsement of the US-Iran peace process that Islamabad has sought to advance. However, he added, "It's also likely a reflection of Pakistan's view that China needs to be brought into the fold to get more buy-in from the Iranians."

Mushahid Hussain Syed, Chairman of the Pakistan-China Institute, termed the framework of "critical importance". He noted that it aligns closely with Iran's position while emphasising the supremacy of the UN and international law, indicating that China is now ready to act as a mediator.

Former information minister Fawad Chaudhry called the five-point initiative “a masterclass in diplomacy”.

“It beautifully & comprehensively converges the security concerns of the USA with the sovereignty of Iran. This document MUST be the basis for an immediate ceasefire and the end of Iran War. Pakistan and China’s 5-point initiative is a masterclass in diplomacy,” he wrote in a post on X.

 

COMMENTS (1)

Salman | 2 weeks ago | Reply China-Pakistan s joint five-point peace framework effectively sidesteps Iran s crucial demands by employing equal language procedural ambiguity and omissions that align with Western and Israeli interests as well as China s economic priorities. This approach also avoids holding Israel accountable for its actions. Symmetric Cessation of Hostilities Unlike Iran s demand for a halt to specific aggression implying Israel US the joint framework calls for an immediate equal stop to all actions by every party effectively treating Iran as equally responsible. Weak Binding Mechanisms Iran s call for strong structural guarantees is replaced with vague commitments to peaceful conduct and no use of force during talks. However past breaches e.g. during Oman-mediated talks demonstrate that this offers little real protection. No Reparations The framework completely omits Iran s demand for compensation and payment for war damages. Limited Scope on Hostilities While it urges stopping attacks on civilians and following International Humanitarian Law symmetrically which could cover Iranian actions too the framework ignores Iran s broader regional network e.g. Hezbollah and doesn t address Israeli campaigns comprehensively. Opposition on Strait of Hormuz Iran s push for recognition of its sovereignty is countered by describing the Strait as an international waterway for free global shipping aligning with China s trade interests and multilateral norms. The framework refrains from naming Israel instead prioritizing China s infrastructure and shipping security including the stability of the CPEC and the security of damaged sites in Iran. It represents coordinated regional diplomacy that effectively neutralizes Iran s position without providing substantial security guarantees. Iran has thus far rejected similar external proposals.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ