Our man in Washington

One constant in Husain Haqqani's life has been a principled opposition to military dominance over civilian affairs.

Editorial November 17, 2011

It’s bad enough that his involvement in the Mansur Ijaz saga will likely lose Husain Haqqani, Pakistan’s ambassador to the US, his job; what is even worse is that it will overshadow the stellar work he did in Washington. Admiral Mike Mullen, the recently-retired chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirmed that he had received a memo written by Ijaz, supposedly at the behest of Haqqani, asking the US to reign in the ISI. Haqqani has tendered his resignation and, although it is yet to be accepted, his role in this affair may well signal the end of his tenure.

Haqqani has been something of a political chameleon throughout his career, starting as a student activist of the Islami Jamiat Taleba, shifting to the PML-N before finally settling on the PPP. But the one constant in his life has been a principled opposition to military dominance over civilian affairs. It is in keeping with this ideology and character, then, that Haqqani would seek to curb the military’s power. But it is how he chose to go about it that is so galling. In doing so, he has provided ammunition to those of his critics who claim that his true loyalties lie with the US, not Pakistan. As such, his actions may end up having an effect opposite to what he had intended. This controversy will also strengthen the military’s hand in castigating the civilian government as sell-outs to the Americans.

Given that the Presidency issued a lengthy statement denouncing Ijaz as a fantasist, Haqqani will likely be the scapegoat and President Zardari will deny all knowledge of his actions. Such an interpretation of events stretches the bounds of credibility but may unfortunately be necessary to keep the military satiated. Amid the torrent of criticism that is sure to come Haqqani’s way in the coming days, though, there are some things that need to be remembered. The military needs to be operating under the authority of the elected government, even if asking the US to arrange that for us is foolish in the extreme. And if Haqqani does leave his post, we will have lost our most effective lobbyist for the country, one who kept US aid flowing and negotiated a satisfactory resolution to the Raymond Davis saga. All the right-wingers who feel jubilation at his demise should keep this in mind amidst their celebrations.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 18th, 2011.


Ajay | 11 years ago | Reply

All, make a note, Haqqani is the future PM of Pakistan who would at some point team up with Imran and Musharraf.

A weak country like Pakistan cannot survive without the benefaction of US, China or no China. Pakistan has taken to many favors from other countriues that it can't just wish off those. It must deliver in a fair manner in teh sense the world understands it to mean not what Pakistani ISI and military strategists think it to mean.

Aftab Kenneth Wilson | 11 years ago | Reply

I don't think Mr. Hussain Haqqani is guilty of any wrong doing. It is a propaganda by the mushroom rightists in our media and people who watch politics from very close range are also aware why undemocratic forces want his removal as Ambassador to USA.. Almost all leading channels and print section is being used as if paid to create hype. Interestingly people only know about Haqqani Network in Wariristan. People are only interested in their day to day affairs.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Most Read