Hasina's conviction

Listen to article

The sentencing of Bangladesh's deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina to six months in prison for contempt of court marks the first step towards punishing her for her authoritarian rule and violent suppression of dissent that eventually led to her downfall. Hasina has been living in India as a state guest since fleeing Dhaka last August. It is worth noting that India has an extradition treaty with Bangladesh, and the conviction should mean Dhaka can now secure Hasina's repatriation, although India's current government has a long record of failing to honour its international commitments.

Hasina's conviction for contempt and interference in judicial proceedings is based on a leaked audio recording in which she appears to be vowing to kill everyone who had filed cases against her. But the six-month conviction pales before the other 200-plus cases facing the former premier. The highest counts are equivalent to crimes against humanity and carry life sentences. Over 1,400 people were killed after Hasina ordered law enforcement to brutally put down the protests that eventually led to her ouster.

Hasina, her family, and close allies also face corruption charges amounting to billions of dollars, with several credible accusations, such as a bridge project that was so tainted that the World Bank withdrew its funding. The corruption charges even affected the British government, with Hasina's niece, a UK minister, having to resign after allegations that she received improper gifts and other benefits from Hasina and her Awami League, though British authorities have cleared her.

Revelations since Hasina's departure show that she held the courts in the same contempt that she held democracy, but there has still been valid international criticism of the closed nature of the trials and investigations. Potentially putting a former PM behind bars should not be taken lightly, and the Bangladeshi government should ensure that the investigations and trials of Hasina are beyond reproach to ensure that neither she nor her allies can ever claim political victimisation.