TODAY’S PAPER | November 11, 2025 | EPAPER

Ariana Grande’s ‘Wicked: For Good’ premiere look divides fans over hair and makeup choices

Ariana Grande’s appearance at the London premiere of 'Wicked: For Good' drew fan debate over her hair and makeup


Pop Culture & Art November 11, 2025 1 min read
Photo: AFP

Ariana Grande’s appearance at the London premiere of Wicked: For Good has sparked debate online, with fans divided over her hair and makeup choices despite praise for her vintage gown. The event, held on Monday night, marked a major stop on the film’s global press tour.

Styled by Law Roach, Grande wore a 1952 vintage gown by designer Gilbert Adrian. The asymmetrical black dress featured a single shoulder strap and a tiered sequin skirt that shimmered under the red carpet lights.

The singer completed her look with a diamond necklace and matching rings, embodying a dark, classic glamour that contrasted with her Glinda-inspired pink looks from earlier in the tour.

While her outfit was widely admired, her beauty look became a focal point of discussion. Fans noted that her slicked-back chignon, styled by Alyx Liu, and minimal makeup by artist Michael Anthony lacked the polish of her past red carpet appearances.

Some viewers felt the pale tones and washed-out contour drained warmth from her face, while others said the understated style reflected her evolving aesthetic.

On social media, fans debated whether the makeup misstep was intentional, referencing Grande’s portrayal of Glinda and her recent comments on experimenting with softer, more theatrical beauty. Others compared the look to her signature polished style, describing it as “uncharacteristically subdued.”

Wicked: For Good sees Grande reprise her role as Glinda alongside Cynthia Erivo as Elphaba. The film continues the story of friendship and destiny set in the world of Oz, following the success of the 2024 Oscar-winning Wicked.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ