The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Khalid Wazir, awarded life-imprisonment to a convict after the prosecution succeeded in establishing the convict’s involvement in desecrating a Surah.
However, the convict in his statement recorded under Section 342 of the CrPC had taken the stance that he had been a Muezzin in a mosque in his area, and he had been implicated in the criminal case at the behest of his enemies.
The judge observed that neither any evidence was presented before the court regarding the convict’s being a Muezzin, nor did he name his enemies so the stance of the accused that he had been implicated in the case was not tenable. The accused had also failed to bring on record any story other than that of the prosecution’s to establish his claim of illegal arrest.
Also read: Swedish police arrest two as riot breaks out at Holy Quran burning protest
The complainant’s counsel, Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry, told the court that there had been substantial evidence which proved the involvement of the accused.
He had requested the court to award strict punishment to the accused for desecrating a Surah.
The counsel for the accused had argued that testimonies of the eye-witnesses had been contradictory, forensic report was not obtained regarding the alleged desecration of the Surah, and the witnesses had not been truthful, who had had some personal vendetta against the accused.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 12th, 2023.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ