A two-member bench comprising Justice Omar Sial and Justice Adnan Chaudhry heard the case against accused Muhammad Hussain. The bench expressed annoyance over the poor performance of the IO and remarked that the IOs only ask for time but do no work. The bench said that such acts should result in contempt of court inquiry against NAB.
SHC summons NAB prosecutor-general in Roshan Sindh case
The NAB prosecutor pleaded the court that a final warning should be given. He assured he would submit a progress report against the accused in the next hearing. At this the bench remarked that no further time will be given.
The court expressed anger at the NAB IO and remarked that whether the accused was dishonest or corrupt, it was the IO’s responsibility to complete the inquiry as soon as possible.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 23rd, 2019.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ