India’s pellet guns rob Kashmiris of their vision

'Indian forces deployed now routinely use pellet guns to stymie roadside demonstrations'


News Desk July 19, 2016
PHOTO: Kashmir Observer

Since protests erupted in Kashmir , over 2,000 people have been injured, most to their eyes owing to small steel pellets fired by Indian forces.

Since the killing of Burhan Wani in a police encounter, Indian-held Kashmir has descended into violence. The government adopted all means to curb the protests  but it failed to prevent clashes between protesters and security forces . The violence has left over 45 people dead while over 2,000 have been injured, including 600 who suffered pellet injuries.

“Scores of young men with bandages on their eyes, before or after undergoing surgery to remove tiny steel pellets from their retinas,” Kashmiri Mirza Waheed describes scenes in Kashmir  The Guardian reported  on Monday.

“Indian forces deployed now routinely use pellet guns to stymie roadside demonstrations,” Waheed states.

The guns, he says, were supposed to be New Delhi’s answer to  ‘non-lethal’ crowd control devices. Owing to the frequent use of the weapon in the past 10 days, doctors have had to perform around 150 eye surgeries. There was a point when requests to seek reinforcement of eye-specialists.

“It’s a fate worse than death,” Waheed narrated one doctor as saying that most victims will lose their eyesight.

“No other country has wilfully blinded scores of youths,” Waheed lamented.

Pakistan fanning flames

Indian Home Minister Rajnath Singh on Monday accused Pakistan of sponsoring unrest in Indian Kashmir as he termed the UN-mandated plebiscite ‘outdated’.

"Pakistan has been playing an irresponsible role, it should not claim to be the protector of Muslims," Singh told the Rajya Sabha, Times of India reported.

"Whatever is happening is completely Pakistan-sponsored. The name is Pakistan, but all its actions are 'napaak'."

Rejecting the disputed status of Kashmir, he asserted that Kashmiris were India’s ‘own people’ and went on to rule out a ‘plebiscite’ in the disputed valley which is mandated under UN Security Council resolutions. He said the plebiscite was ‘outdated’ and that the people of the valley were being ‘misguided’ on the issue.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 19th, 2016.

Our Publications

COMMENTS (23)

Mirza Asif Baig | 4 years ago | Reply My Friend, is in Kashmir. He told me what indians are doing with them. Cruelty at its Peak there.
FAZ | 4 years ago | Reply @Daredevil: Please talk facts Before each and every operation carried out in FATA and tribal areas enough time has been given for women, children and everyone who doesn't want to raise arms against army to leave the area so that it could be swept for terror infrastructures and ammunitions. Then we see same people like you crying out the propaganda that their is no element of surprize for the terrorists being given. When the army demands F-16 for precision bombings, then they are again denied for covering up failures in Afghanistan. The only human rights violation reported so far are in Balochistan and Karachi operations regarding forced disappearances. In any case when did you ever see a large scale demonstration against the state? Or that prolonged curfew has been imposed not to mention use of deadly weapons and force against protestors armed with stones! India and Israel are true friends when it comes to oppressing and the world is just a collection of hypocrites that will ignore everything for economic relations. Might is right and unfortunately the poor Kahmiris do not count anywhere as humans
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ