Act of hypocrisy

Terrorists have no religion and this is something that needs to be understood clearly by all


Editorial March 29, 2015
Debris from the Germanwings Airbus A320 is seen strewn over the crash site in the French Alps above the southeastern town of Seyne-les-Alps PHOTO: AFP

The crash of the Germanwings Airbus A320 into the French Alps this week, which killed all 150 people on board, was a tragedy. But it also brought out acts of extreme hypocrisy and bigotry. As soon as reports came out stating that co-pilot Andreas Lubitz, who deliberately crashed the plane was not a Muslim, the crash was declared not to be an act of terrorism. It is unclear what Lubitz’s religion had to do with terrorist actions. We can be almost certain that had it been shown that he had connections with Islamic groups, this would not have been the case.

The stereotyping that we see is becoming frightening. Essentially, terrorism has become an act which the world holds is carried out just by Muslims. In doing so, the world ignores the numerous acts of murder and mayhem which, say, the state of Israel has carried out over the years against hapless Palestinians.

There also seemed to be an anxiety to associate Lubitz, who apparently suffered from severe depression, with a particular religion. Even now some conjecture as to this is being eked out by the media despite the lack of evidence. This tendency has to be challenged. There has been too much of it in recent years. Persons of other religions, as the Germanwings crash proves, are quite capable of terrible acts of violence motivated by various factors. It is this that brought the plane down to its terrifying end. Right now, we see what amounts to virtual disappointment at least in some sections of the global media that the French prosecutor has denied that Lubitz had any Muslim connections. The bias is coming through loud and clear. A louder voice against these tendencies needs to be raised across the world and it must be ensured there is more balance in the coverage of events. This balance was completely missing as news of the crash broke. Indeed, deliberate attempts at manufacturing what people wanted to hear seemed to have taken place. Terrorists have no religion and could be loosely associated with any belief. This is something that needs to be understood clearly by all.

Published in The Express Tribune, March  30th,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

 

COMMENTS (3)

woody | 9 years ago | Reply I think Editor does a great job of showing his/her own bias rather than demonstrating the bias of the Western media. . The investigators seemed to focus on the evidence rather than his religion. That's how they determined he was seeing a Doctor for mental illness - was hiding his illness from his employer - and was considered unstable by his girlfriend. That investigation also didn't discover anything that would lead them to believe that he killed himself and others for any terrorist cause. . Maybe the Editor can provide us with his explanation on why this guy should have been labeled as a Terrorist?
VASAN | 9 years ago | Reply Let us accept the facts 1. Nobody who is a serious follower of any religion follows 100% of his/her holy book. 2. Yet they claim they are muslims/hindus/christians/jews etc 3. People make convenient excuses when they dont follow the holy books, eg not giving alms, drinking, be kind to others etc are general advices given by every religion. Yet there are more exceptions and acceptance of all these at all times 4. All holy books are subject to different interpretations by different sects/people at different times. 5. Given these and other similar facts, how does one categorize a person as a christian or hindu or muslim. Only by what he claims to be and what he professes. 6. Then how does one keeps saying ad nauseum that "Terrorists have no religion" The so called terrorists when they commit their acts they do it on their belief of their religion and who are others to say that they are not followers of the religion they claim to be. Do we ourselves follow all the rules all the times, for eg Dont pakistanis drink which is against their religion, Dont Pakistanis commit other acts against their religious beliefs. Simply disowning the terrorists saying they are not muslims is the major problem. It is an ostrich mentality of disowning the crime and the criminal, And that is the major problem. ET these comments are not against any religion in particular. Pl publish
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ