At UN, Pakistan and India spar over Kashmir

The purpose of Indian allegations, he said, was to force Pakistan to stop raising the issue of Kashmir at the UN

APP November 04, 2015


Pakistan on Tuesday firmly rejected an Indian claim to Kashmir as an ‘integral part’ of India, saying it was an internationally-recognised disputed territory, as representatives of the two countries sparred over the decades-old issue at the United Nations.

“The legal and factual background of Jammu  and Kashmir dispute is quite clear and efforts to mislead or confuse the international community would not succeed,” Diyar Khan, a minister at the Pakistan Mission to the United Nations, told the General Assembly’s Third Committee, which deals with social, humanitarian and cultural questions.

“Kashmir is not and cannot be an integral part of India,” the Pakistani diplomat said, adding that the disputed nature of state was well established by several UN Security Council resolutions that call for a settlement of this problem through a free and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the United Nations.

Diyar Khan was reacting to a statement by Indian delegate Rattan Lal Kataria, who harped on the same old tune that Kashmir was its ‘integral part’ and that Pakistan was in illegal occupation of a part of that ‘Indian state’. He also claimed that people in Indian-occupied Kashmir had regularly participated in ‘free, fair and open elections’.

Kataria, a member of Indian parliament, was responding to a strong statement made by Pakistan’s Ambassador Maleeha Lodhi in support of Kashmiri people’s right to self-determination on Monday.

Diyar Khan, who was speaking in right of reply to the Indian delegate’s assertions, referred to the argument that Kashmiris had already exercised their right to self-determination through elections, and said it was a fact known to all that elections in Indian-occupied Kashmir were not only not recognised by the UN Security Council but also rejected by the people of Kashmir and their representative political leadership.

The Security Council resolutions had also clarified that no electoral exercise conducted by Indian authorities in Jammu and Kashmir could be accepted as substitute to a free and impartial plebiscite under the UN auspices.

About the Indian allegations of terrorism, he called it a motivated campaign to divert attention from the real issue, saying such tactics would not set aside the Kashmiris’ inalienable right to self-determination.

The purpose of Indian allegations, he said, was to force Pakistan to stop raising the issue of Kashmir at the UN.

Referring to the charge that Pakistan was occupying parts of Kashmir, Diyar Khan asked India to leave this question to the people of Kashmir. “If only India would agree to the UN plebiscite, as we do, the exercise of this free choice by the people of Jammu and Kashmir would clarify, once and for all, as to who is the real occupying force in Kashmir.”

Published in The Express Tribune, November 5th, 2015.


Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read