Thai police urge patience as lack of equipment hampers bomb probe

Anxiety is mounting six days after the attack, which killed 20 people in the capital's commercial heart


Afp August 23, 2015
People pray at the Erawan shrine, the site of Monday's deadly blast, in central Bangkok, Thailand, August 20, 2015. PHOTO: REUTERS

BANGKOK: Authorities on Sunday urged patience in their hunt for the Bangkok shrine bomber, as the police chief admitted Thailand lacks some of the "modern equipment" to find the prime suspect captured on security cameras.

Anxiety is mounting six days after the attack, which killed 20 people in the capital's commercial heart, with the bomber still on the run.

Read: Thai police investigating CCTV showing second suspicious bag drop

The hunt has so far focused on a suspect in a yellow T-shirt seen on CCTV placing a rucksack under a bench at the Erawan shrine minutes before the blast.

A sketch of the man has been widely circulated and a bounty of more than $300,000 has been offered for his arrest.

He is described on his arrest warrant as "foreign" but police have since said he could in fact be Thai or of mixed race.

Unverified footage, time-stamped just a few minutes after Monday's blast, shows a second man in a blue T-shirt kicking a package into water near a bridge in the same spot where a device exploded on Tuesday without injuries. But police have not publicly linked the two blasts despite pressure to reveal more.

"The slowness of the investigation is not because the police lack capacity," national police chief Somyot Poompanmoungyot told reporters. "But it's because we don't have the modern equipment that supports the work."

He did not reveal the equipment the police need but it is likely to be facial recognition technology or programmes to enhance security camera footage.

Earlier in the week junta chief Prayut Chan-O-Cha bristled at suggestions his government should seek overseas help in a complicated inquiry, with several nations offering their expertise. It is not clear if any offers have since been officially accepted.

Despite their technical limitations, police say the investigation is progressing but they accept that the main suspect could have left the country.

"We cannot give details of that progress... let the police work," police spokesman Prawut Thavornsiri said. "We are working around the clock.... but this kind of a case is not easy."

The shrine bomb killed mostly ethnic Chinese tourists from across Asia. More than 50 people remain in hospital.

Read: Thaksin's son doubles reward for Bangkok bomb suspect

With no-one claiming responsibility, rumours and speculation have swirled in Thailand over the country's worst single mass-casualty attack in living memory.

Two people have been arrested for spreading rumours and hoaxes over social media, a junta spokesman said Sunday.

The potential perpetrators named by police and experts alike include international extremists, members of Thailand's southern Malay-Muslim insurgency, militants on both sides of Thailand's festering political divide or even someone with a personal grudge.

Police chief Somyot said a network of at least 10 people were behind the attack, which was likely planned at least one month in advance. But no arrests have been made over the bombing and the information flow has slowed.

To fill the gap, local and international media have done their own sleuthing, reporting on possible leads and suspects, even publishing the name of the man reportedly at the centre of the police probe — although Prawut has told AFP that name is incorrect.

Monday's bomb came during a time of heightened concerns about the kingdom's future, with few signs of a breakthrough in a decade-long political crisis.

The blast exposes the ruling junta, which ousted an elected government in May last year, to criticism that it cannot guarantee security.

Tourism is also likely to be hit by the attack, threatening to heap more misery on an already anaemic economy.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ