Thumprints on most votes cast in NA-122 can't be verified due to poor quality: Nadra

Out of 184,151 votes polled, thumbprints on 40% of the votes were verified, while for 51% quality was poor


Rana Yasif/web Desk May 09, 2015
PHOTO: PPI

LAHORE: The National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) submitted its report regarding elections in NA-122 before the Election Tribunal, wherein it said that their systems could not verify nearly 40% of the votes cast in the constituency on May 11, 2013.

National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq had beaten Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman Imran Khan to the seat. Khan, alleging that the election had been rigged to ensure that Sadiq and the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz won the seat, had challenged the result with the election tribunal.

Read: NADRA will release report exposing 'rigging' in NA-122: Imran Khan

While pursuing the case, the tribunal had ordered Nadra to submit its report on the elections. On Saturday, Nadra submitted its reports, copies of which were also given to counsels of both political parties.

Per the report, Nadra said it had processed 184,151 votes through the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) to match fingerprints on counterfoils with fingerprint data of registered voter/ held with NADRA.

The software discovered that they had verified the thumb impressions on 73, 478 votes, nearly 40% of all the votes cast in the constituency. Further, the report stated that 93,852 votes could not be processed because of the poor quality of the fingerprints.

Further, Nadra said that during authentication they discovered that there were 6,123 votes cast on which the CNIC numbers used were invalid (never issued by Nadra). There were 2,862 votes which carried notarization issues with digits of CNIC numbers missing. There were 3,440 votes on which writing was illegible. There were 370 vote counterfoils on which the CNIC number had not been noted, while on 255 counterfoils, the CNIC number had been mentioned multiple times.

They found 1,715 votes on which there were no fingerprints to scan.

Additionally there were 570 votes with CNIC numbers which were not registered in NA-122.



After the reports were presented, PTI counsel Anees Ali Hashmi asked whether the election was fair given that 51% of the votes could not be verified and claimed that this was the ‘second wicket’ that the PML-N will lose.

On the other hand Sadiq’s son said that the PTI chief was misleading the nation, adding that rigging could not be proved in the constituency.

Dr Ali Sadiq said that Imran Khan should avoid damaging his credibility.



PMLN’s counsel Barrister Asjad Saeed told The Express Tribune that NADRA’s report was compared with its CNIC’s record rather than verifying it in light of Supreme Court of Pakistan’s judgment SCMR 1999. He added that the election of returning candidate could not be declared null and void in light of negligence of polling staff.

Read: 'Commission finds no counterfeit votes in NA-122 ballot bags'

Following a tribunal's announcement for re-polling in NA-125, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief, Imran Khan had said that NADRA would release a report pertaining to alleged rigging in NA-122 within a week.

An election tribunal had accepted a petition by PTI chief Imran Khan and constituted a commission to probe into the alleged rigging in NA-122, the constituency from where National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq was elected.

COMMENTS (44)

Asad | 8 years ago | Reply Can see much politics being played around this , election system is based on personal verification by presiding officer not based on NADRA's ability to verify thumb print or not. Clearly proves PTI and Imran Khan's ill intent and lack of acceptance of their defeat that they want to declare Election null and void based on thumb verification capabiliy.Utter nonsense they knew going into the election that this is being done just for testing purposes and to make it a law it first needs to be discussed and passed in parliament before practising it. The thing is 2013 election was not based on thumb print verification it was based on having presiding officers and polling agents manually verifiying voters based on voter lists provided by NADRA and to keep it transparrent we have all party representitives present their who do this hectic activity and it is now for sure proven that then un verified voters were indeeed first verified by the staff and they had a genuine ID Card , so all is legal. Just based on a functionality that is not present right now trying to call 2013 election null and void is "like a football team which participated in a past football world cup tournament held by fifa after getting defeated says we want goal line technology and apply it on a previoudly held worldcup and unless someones does it re do the tournament" Utter non sense , illogical and only a fool or highly mean person with maliciious intent can cause disturbance noise over such demands.
Ranjha | 8 years ago | Reply @Naz: Take your pill please!
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ