ISLAMABAD: The attorney general of Pakistan (AGP) disclosed on Monday that a Swiss tribunal’s verdict regarding the case of a valuable jewellery set, belonging to the legal heirs of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, has been referred to the law ministry for translation.
“The Swiss Tribunal’s verdict was received by the AGP office last week and has been sent to the law ministry for translation,” Salman Aslam Butt said while speaking to The Express Tribune.
Butt added that after the verdict is translated from Swiss to English, he would be able to give his opinion to the government on the future course of action.
A Swiss federal tribunal ruled that the valuable jewellery set, seized by authorities in connection with investigations into graft allegations, belonged to former president Asif Ali Zardari or the legal heirs of late prime minister Benazir Bhutto. The set, which includes a necklace, a bracelet, a pair of earrings and a ring, is said to be valued over $180,000.
In the judgment, issued on October 29, the tribunal rejected ownership claims filed by Bomer Finance for the jewels. The company, allegedly formed by Jens Schlegelmilch and linked to Zardari, was at the centre of the SGS-Cotecna investigation.
According to Francois Roger Micheli, a counsel from the firm Python and Peter, which represented the government of Pakistan before the Swiss tribunal, the judgment states that Schlegelmilch “appeared to have acted as the attorney for the BB-AAZ (Benazir Bhutto-Asif Ali Zardari) couple”.
The case was originally filed by the AGP in October 1997 against Benazir Bhutto, her mother Nusrat Bhutto and husband Asif Ali Zardari.
The jewels were among items reportedly seized the same year, but the original cases were closed in 2008 following the promulgation of the National Reconciliation Ordinance. However, the cases were reopened on the orders of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
Zardari, in the past, has publicly disowned these ornaments and denied allegations of corruption in the SGS-Cotecna scandal.
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ