Name confusion: 8 lawyers, 50 others charged with blasphemy

Protesters shouted slogans against SHO Umar Daraz, booked for remarks against Hazrat Umar (RA).


Shamsul Islam May 14, 2014
Protesters shouted slogans against SHO Umar Daraz, booked for remarks against Hazrat Umar (RA). PHOTO: FILE

FAISALABAD:


Police have registered a blasphemy case against eight lawyers and 50 other people in Jhang for shouting derogatory slogans against a police chief who shares a name with the second Muslim caliph Hazrat Umar ibn Khattab (RA).


The lawyers were protesting against SHO Umar Daraz after one of their colleagues was allegedly manhandled by police officers following a road accident last week.

Soon after, complainant Arshad Mehmood moved an application in the police station alleging that his religious feelings were offended because the lawyers used the name “Umar” in their protest and lodged charges.

“A blasphemy case has been registered against eight lawyers and about 50 others after a citizen complained that they were shouting slogans derogatory to a Caliph of Islam and a companion of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH),” said senior police official Ghulam Mustafa.

However, Jhang Bar Association’s spokesperson Naveed Akram told The Express Tribune, “A few days ago, seven police officers, including SHO Umar Daraz and Assistant Sub Inspector (ASI) Mubashar, were booked for beating up and illegally detaining a lawyer named Aftab Nadeem. Though the police registered a case, it did not arrest Daraz.”

The lawyers were protesting against the police for not taking any action against the SHO, while demanding his immediate arrest.

They did not chant slogans against Hazrat Umar (RA), but the namesake SHO, explained Jhang DBA President Muhammad Afzal Sial.

The complainant, Arshad Mehmood, is a member of Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat and is said to be a close aide to its chief Maulana Ahmad Ludhianvi. Mehmood has registered and been a witness in at least five blasphemy cases before.

Meanwhile, DPO Zeeshan Akhtar said a committee has been constituted to probe into both cases against the lawyers and the SHO.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 14th, 2014.

COMMENTS (14)

Uzair | 7 years ago | Reply

@Gurion: No, the concept of a law to punish someone for things said (much less by the death penalty) is frivolous in its very nature.

@Mj: Therein lies the problem. The blasphemy law is made and supported by the scholars of Islam. Do they know Islam better or the rest of us?

vaqas | 7 years ago | Reply

I dont see how naming someone with a revered islamic name will cause his/her persecution, as some of the comments suggest. If anything it will protect them from mobs chanting slogans carrying his name, if such an unfortunate event arisis in that persons life. The SHO is going scott free just because he has umer in his name. I would suggest people read the news more closely. And to the defenders of this draconian law, i say you shall sow what you reap. Dont be coming crying when injustice befalls you, because you know what you did and it will be injustice no more.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read