Fair elections: Students call for electronic voting

The students also proposed deploying the army to maintain security during elections.


News Desk February 07, 2014
The students also proposed deploying the army to maintain security during elections. PHOTO: EXPRESS/FILE



Pakistan should move from manual voting systems to electronic ones to remove the possibility of bogus voting in elections.


Students demanded this at a consultative meeting at Peer Meher Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi on Thursday. The event was organised by the Centre for Peace and Development Initiatives (CPDI) and Free and Fair Election Network (FAFEN), said a press release issued on Thursday.


The students also expressed serious reservation on the performance of the elected representatives and demand the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to do strict scrutiny of all the contesting candidates.


It was also demanded that there should be an option for voters to reject all candidates.


The students also proposed deploying the army to maintain security during elections. Some of students also suggested enhancing the authority of presiding officers to maintain discipline at polling stations.


Published in The Express Tribune, February 7th, 2014.

COMMENTS (1)

Shakil Khan | 10 years ago | Reply Electronic voting can outsmart thugs, but when the conductors are corrupt! They will find work around this too. When a selected caretaker set up is actually set up to take care of the selected outcome of elections anything is possible even with electronic voting! they will never allow to cross check as they are doing now! They start with fake surveys to impact voters perception, followed by nasty techniques to stop voters of other parties, they will buy or pressurise voters, and if this is not enough they will change the results before announcing! #35Punctures! in Punjab, how many punctures were in Karachi? or other palces?
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ