
Recently, I interviewed the head of the United Nations in Pakistan. Citing the extreme poverty of the people in Awaran, he expressed keen interest in helping the Balochistan government with rebuilding efforts. Because the town is prone to earthquakes, he pledged to use UN expertise to rebuild houses and shelters. The offer was extended because the people are extremely poor and in need of earthquake-proof structures. But the UN has not been permitted to help these neglected people. And this fact suggests that something is really wrong in Balochistan; something that acceptance of the UN assistance might bring to light.
The state is not in a position to construct earthquake-proof houses and infrastructure in Awaran because it lacks the expertise and funds to do so.
The chief minister of Balochistan recently issued a statement admonishing the National Highway Authority for its failure to release funds earmarked for ongoing highway projects, which have remained unfinished for decades. Given this state of affairs, it is safe to assume that the promised rebuilding of the houses destroyed by the earthquake is little more than a pipe dream. The prime minister recently promised to either provide funds, or direct government institutions, to rebuild homes. I would propose that he instead accept the help of international aid agencies to rebuild the area.
Awaran drew international attention because of the devastating effects of the earthquake. Otherwise, it was just another neglected town with no facilities. Casting suspicion on the loyalty of the local people and barring international aid organisations from helping to alleviate their suffering will only further fuel the mistrust that already afflicts the region. The people of Awaran deserve better. They deserve a government response that puts the needs of the people first; even if that means accepting help from outside.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 4th, 2013.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ