There has never been any official explanation as to why our security agencies had looked the other way while the so-called Quetta Shura of Afghan Taliban conducted its war of resistance inside Afghanistan, from the safety of the neighbouring Pakistani province of Balochistan. When, somewhere around 2010, the Shura disappeared in thin air, no one in the officialdom bothered to explain why and how — perhaps, because we had never acknowledged its existence. Also, there never was any official explanation of what we intended to do with the fleeing Afghan Taliban being taken into custody as they crossed into Pakistan to escape capture by invading foreign troops led by the US. Now that we have released nearly 40 Afghan Taliban prisoners from our custody, including the much-in-demand Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, clearly on the demand of the Afghan government of President Hamid Karzai and also, perhaps, under pressure from the US, it would not be out of place to ask if there was any trade-off, and if so, what did we get in return; and if not, then why did we drag our feet all these months while the pressure was mounting for their release.
In the absence of official answers to the questions raised above, we can only indulge in informed speculation and conjecture. Those who had witnessed the first Afghan war and its aftermath would find it almost impossible not to agree with the idea of authorities in Islamabad planning to meet the endgame of the current Afghan war with both our feet firmly on ground.
When the first Afghan war ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the US walked away leaving Pakistan to deal with the aftermath. And we tried, with the help of Saudi Arabia and UAE, to place a puppet in Kabul but failed miserably as Iran, Russia and perhaps, also India helped the Northern Alliance foil our attempt to achieve the so-called strategic depth in Afghanistan. Understandably, our new plan to meet the endgame post-2014 withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan is, perhaps, based on the premise that the US would once again walk away from the region leaving Pakistan to deal with the aftermath. That is, perhaps, why we tried all these years to remain on the right side of the Afghan Taliban by letting the Quetta Shura do what it did until the US conveyed to us, in very clear terms but without making the threat public, that drones could be sent to Quetta as well. But we kept the top Taliban leadership safe and secure under the so-called protective custody waiting for the endgame to begin so that after the withdrawal we could use ‘our Afghan Taliban’ to have a decisive say in Kabul.
Perhaps, both the US and the Karzai government realised what we were up to and that is perhaps, why pressure was once again mounted on Pakistan to ‘release’ the Afghan Taliban in Pakistan’s ‘custody’ on the excuse that these elements would help in the process of reconciliation and post-withdrawal peace and stability in wartorn Afghanistan. Once again, we succumbed to pressure and let go most Afghan Taliban leaders in Pakistan’s custody, except of course, Mullah Omar who is not in our ‘protective custody’ but who is said to be accessible only to Pakistani authorities and that, too, after a fortnight’s effort.
In the first place, the premise that the US would walk away from Afghanistan after 2014 is wrong. And it is doubly wrong to presume that it would leave the aftermath to be dealt with by Pakistan. No US boots were involved in the first Afghan war and so, it was easy for Washington, then, to walk away. This time the boots are very much there and it is going to be a drawdown and not a complete withdrawal. Also, the US has raised a 350,000 strong Afghan Army which would, after the 2014 drawdown, look after the internal and external security of the country, guided closely by the residual US army units. And there is going to a presidential election in six months’ time in Afghanistan. In this scheme of things, one finds it almost impossible to see any place for the Afghan Taliban or Pakistan in post-2014 Afghanistan.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 25th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
A new dawn has eclipsed in Afghanistan and they are in the driver's seat negotiating the tough terrain and political landscape of the region. Afghanistan has arrived and there is no turning back.
Spoilers will try their hand at derailing and undermining the Afghans without any success.
@Professor: Not the region, only Pakistan. All others are working on their development agendas.
The region is a mess and it keeps getting worse.
There are a lots of variables in this post 2014 equation and any outcome is possible depending on these variables. The most important being the financial situation in US and now rapidly bursting bubble of Indian ' growth' that is dependent on change from the US. This will put Indians in their right place and their big head will get back to the normal size. One can not , in any case , outrightly write off Taliban from this equation. They are not just a religious , extremist outfit. There are complex tribal ethnic and sectarian issues involved that will strengthen their hand and they will either fight on, or will get significant , indirect role and influence in post 2014 Afghanistan and beyond. Even if you take away Taliban element, fortunately or unfortunately Afghanistan remains heavily dependent on Pakistan for normal functioning. This dependence could and should be exploited and I hope , will be exploited for mutual benefit instead of political point scoring. So pakistan still keeps some of its cards in post 2014 Afghanistan. Afghanistan can not relocate its geographic and social dependence from Pakistan to Iran , again due to ethnic sectarian and international complexities.
@Parvez: Yes.......the article failed to fully come to grips on the reader. Salams
@aqib: Yes.......peace for Pakistan, Afghanistan, and the Islamic world is a light at the end of the tunnel that continues to recede further. Salams
The foreign troops are the least of your worries. If you think the policies of double dealing have been counter productive now, wait until you no longer have NATO support. It boggles the mind. Do you really think these militants are just going to leave Pakistan alone and become your subservient proxies given more power? Leave Afghanistan in peace. You share its fate ten fold.
If the foreign troops remain after 2014, one thing is for sure- Peace (whatever measly chances are of that) will not come to either Pakistan or Afghanistan.
Lets wait for 2014 and the financial misery that is visiting itself upon the US will ensure a complete US withdrawal from Afghanistan.
dont..worry let the 2014 come..after 2014 Indian will be doing business of copper,alluminium with afghanistan democratic govt...while pakistan as usual will do its strategic business with taliban...
The article came across as a bit disjointed especially the last paragraph which somehow failed to connect and did not fully add up.