The Islamabad High Court’s dismissal of the FIR is also unlikely to be a harbinger of tolerance and good judgment in future blasphemy cases. The evidence in favour of Rimsha was so overwhelming and she herself cut such a pitiful figure that the courts could rule in no other way. So obvious was her innocence that even extremist Islamic groups, who are otherwise very enthusiastic about the blasphemy laws, called for her freedom. One would hope that seeing how unscrupulous people are so willing to make false accusations of blasphemy would show judges that these charges are often framed out of personal vendettas and less faith ought to be put in such testimony in the future.

If a change is to be brought about in how the blasphemy laws are misused, it will have to be political and societal. Our representatives need to use the Rimsha case to push for a reform of the laws. Punishments for those who make false accusations need to be strengthened and an exception has to be carved out for minors who are accused of blasphemy. Above all, we the people need to change. We need to rely on reason and not fall prey to our basest instincts. So far, the state has not executed anybody for blasphemy; all the deaths associated with it have come from enraged mobs. It is this mentality that needs to be tackled and fought.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 21st, 2012.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ