Movie review: Not taken by 'Taken 2'
Taken 2 is a stereotypical action movie sequel. It piles on more of everything, except for originality, while recycling the plot of the first film. In fact, its narrative is such a shameless rehash that Taken 2 resorts to numerous flashbacks from the first film, unable to carry the narrative on its own.
In the first film, retired CIA field agent Bryan Mills (Liam Neeson) had hunted down and killed the prostitution gang that had kidnapped and tried to sell off his daughter Kim Mills (Maggie Grace). The film is set two months after Taken (2008) as the crooked Albanian businessman Murad Krasniqi (Rade Šerbedžija), who is the father of one of Kim’s kidnappers, vows to have his vengeance.
Soon enough Bryan’s family is attacked once again but this time the baddies kidnap Bryan’s ex-wife Lenore (Famke Janssen). Although the body count in Taken 2 is certainly quite high, the action sequences aren’t particularly exciting nor are they inventive as Bryan effortlessly kills almost every Albanian baddie in Europe. In fact, at some point I started to feel sorry for the Albanians who were dropping like flies. Yes, Taken 2 made me feel sad for cutthroat killers and kidnappers.
Moreover, the film features a ridiculously unbelievable chase sequence where Bryan and his daughter crash into the US Embassy in a stolen taxi without any major injuries. That’s the biggest flaw in Taken 2: it seems as if Bryan and his family are immortal. Intellectual properties like Die Hard, 24 and the Tom Clancy films have all had similar plots as the Taken films but they were much more successful at creating suspense because the protagonists and their family members were always close to dying or being seriously injured.
Regardless, let’s just hope for the sake of the future of Albania that Bryan Mills’ family is now left well enough alone. Although with Taken 2 having already achieved box-office success on its first weekend, the next kidnapping is bound to happen in the near future. There is certainly money in it.
Published in The Express Tribune, Sunday Magazine, October 21st, 2012.
Like Express Tribune Magazine on Facebook and follow at @ETribuneMag
COMMENTS (3)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1730355716-0/Copy-of-Untitled-(59)1730355716-0-270x192.webp "three tortured brooding period drama heroes to swoon over")
1730276684-0/Copy-of-Untitled-(55)1730276684-0-270x192.webp "a potterhead s plea ditch lupin s moustache and make sirius cool")
1730095495-1/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-28-at-11-04-18-(1)1730095495-1-270x192.webp "witches enchanting their way into the 2000s")
eeeek. Fudged up the pasting:
Published sentence:
Original sentence:
The edited published sentence is a cleaner and more cohesive sentence, but I can see how you misinterpreted it.
Of course the characters in Taken 2 "appear" to come close to dying. But I never bought it. It all seemed very artificial.
Watch the first 12 episodes of the first season of 24. The show creates a very real emotional stake.
@Syed Usman:
I normally don't reply to comments, but I will make an exception. I genuinely thought this was a bad movie. Why? Because it was a really bad movie.
Regarding what you said about the "near death experience":
In my defense I didn't write the sentence which you speak of:
"but they were much more successful at creating suspense the protagonists and their family members were always close to dying or being seriously injured."
In my defense, that wasn't how I wrote it. I wrote the following:
"but they were much more successful at creating suspense the protagonists because the protagonists and their family members felt quite vulnerable to danger."
The implication of my sentence is that although there is danger, characters in Taken 2 seem invulnerable to it.
The published sentence, which although is fine, has probably lead you to interpret things differently.
Really lame review and dude if the throat cut scene of agent Bray's wife was not near death experience then seriously there is something wrong with your movie observation skills.. my advice to you would be to not compare apple with oranges as next thing you would be doing would be saying that it lacked the gore like in Expendables 2.. go find some other job rather than criticizing a movie just for the sake of it!!