
The timing of this award is particularly strange. The last few years have not been kind to the EU, with the worldwide economic depression hitting member countries such as Spain and Greece very hard. Austerity measures imposed on them as a price of receiving bailouts from countries such as Germany has sown mistrust and there is even the possibility of the EU struggling to survive as a single economic entity. Awarding the prize to the EU seems to be meant as an inducement for the member countries to stick together, just as awarding it to President Obama was to bind him to follow a path of peace. If the Nobel Peace Prize Committee does indeed believe that to be the case, then it is surely overrating the power of its award.
The official rationale for the prize is that the coming together of the Western European countries prevented the outbreak of another continental war. What the judges seemed not to understand is that it wasn’t the EU which stopped war; rather, it was the cessation of hostilities that allowed the EU to become a reality. In any case, if not going to war is enough to land a Peace Prize, just about every country in the world would be a prime candidate. That is the chief problem with the selection of the EU. There are millions of individuals, like our very own Abdul Sattar Edhi, who were more deserving winners. Instead, the Nobel Peace Prize Committee decided to play politics with an award that has now lost its lustre.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 14th, 2012.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ