1995 coup attempt: 15 years on, SC takes up key case

The case concerns a plot to overthrow Benazir Bhutto’s second govt.

Azam Khan August 14, 2012


After a lapse of 15 years, the Supreme Court has once again taken up a high-profile case which may now involve the president and chief of army staff.

A three-judge bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, has issued a notice to the legal heirs of the late Maj-Gen (retd) Zaheerul Islam Abbasi (who had previously filed an appeal against his court martial) and other parties concerned in the case.

The review petition was filed by three officials – Maj Gen (retd) Abbasi, Brig Mustansur Billah and Col Azad Minhas – against their court martial by the Pakistan Army. Abbasi, Billah, two colonels and 38 other military officers were arrested on Sept 26, 1995 on charges of plotting to assassinate corps commanders during a meeting to be held on Sept 30 at the GHQ.

They had also allegedly plotted to proclaim caliphate with Abbasi as Amirul Momeneen (Leader of the Faithful) after assassinating then prime minister Benazir Bhutto and then army chief Gen Abdul Waheed Kakkar, as well as senior cabinet ministers and senior military officers.

The Supreme Court had rejected Abbasi’s appeal filed in 1997 against the seven-year jail term awarded to him by the Field General Court Marshal (FGCM). The court had observed that the matter was outside the purview of civilian courts.

During Monday’s hearing, Maj-Gen (retd) Abbasi’s counsel Habib Wahabul Khairi told the court that his client had been accused of attempting to overthrow the government, which had prompted the army to court martial him.

Over the years, Abbasi’s assets were also confiscated, which was a violation of army regulations, the counsel argued. He requested on behalf of Abbasi’s widow that the court order his assets be returned.

After hearing the counsel’s arguments, the court issued a notice to the parties concerned. In the petition, the respondents included the president and the chief of army staff – referred to merely by their designation and not by their names.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 14th, 2012.


Syed Shah | 9 years ago | Reply

Implement the 60 days law and those judges found guilty of procrastination be duly punished by sacking or suspension or demotion and fined five year's salary. High time somebody questioned the lower down judges. Either implement this 60 days law "Illegal Dispossion Act 2005, No: 11/2005. Public Gazetted 2005 or scarp it. Don't fool people. I hope Honorable CJ Sahab is reading Tribune.

A J Khan | 9 years ago | Reply

This judiciary has knack for wasting its own and nations time in futile matters. Why can't he give time to the general public and toiling masses cases? Can some one guide him for the better?

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read