Punjab govt facing problems in selling its assets

The sale is in jeopardy owing to marked discrepancies in the reserve calculated by government and private evaluators.

Anwer Sumra August 17, 2010

LAHORE: The sale of public so-called redundant and surplus assets in Punjab is in jeopardy owing to marked discrepancies in the reserve or minimum prices calculated by the government and private evaluators.

In fact, it seems the provincial government seems to have earned more criticism than money from the sale of its properties.

In November 2009, the Punjab government identified more than 1,400 properities, including commercial, residential and agriculture, for sale. It was hoped that their sale would help the government raise more than Rs12 billion which would go towards easing its financial problems.

In the last nine months, some 140 properties for the total amount of Rs3,291.427 million have been auctioned. So far, Rs900 million have been deposited in the government exchequer and the properties have been handed over to the bidders.

According to government sources, however, despite the auctioning of public assets, the financial position of the province remains critical and it is still constantly availing the overdraft facility to run official business and deal with financial affairs.

In order to carry out the task, the Punjab government promulgated an act called “The Punjab Privatisation Board Act 2010” while the Punjab Privatisation Board (PPB) was entrusted to enter into agreement, acquire, hold, manage and dispose of properties and to sue and be sued in its name.

In order to make the process more transparent, the board hired the services of five private evaluators to assess the base price of the properties marked for auction. In addition, the District Price Assessment Committee (DPAC) was also directed to conduct an assessment of the properties.

The result of the two evaluations was discrepancies between the value placed on the properties by private evaluators and the DPAC. The first 300 properties were calculated to be worth approximately Rs3 billion by the private evaluators whereas the DPAC placed their value at Rs9 billion.

Without seeing these discrepancies being settled, the board placed some 709 properties for auction.

However, the auction of 257 properties was cancelled due to low bidding and lack of interest by potential investors, causing embarrassment for the  departments concerned while queries were raised on the level of transparency in the whole process, an official said.

Following the poor response from the market, the privatisation board suggested to Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif that DPAC’s evaluations be dropped as the values calculated by it were higher than market rates, the official added. This suggestion, though, was not followed.

According to a senior official of the district government Multan, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, even the evaluations by private evaluators were based on false information to benefit some hidden hands.

He said that some properties in Multan were sold for even more than the price calculated by the DPAC. Moreover, costly public land retrieved from the illegal possession of a private housing society in Multan has not yet been included in the privatisation process, he added.

Responding to the criticism, chairman of the privatisation board, Nazar Muhammad Chohan, said efforts were underway rationalise reserve prices, adding that some properties were sold for more than what was calculated by either the government or private evaluators. By June 2011, the board hoped to meet its target of raising Rs12 billion by auctioning properties, he said.

Chohan also said that more than 70 per cent guesthouses owned by the irrigation department were not disclosed by the department to discourage the ongoing privatisation.

Defending the process, Chohan said that the auction was fair and the poor response was a result of multiple factors, including recession and the lengthy process of handing over the properties to buyers.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 17th, 2010.


Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read