A long-standing demand from the police force to access mobile phone data and have wiretapping capacity is set to be met. The development comes after the interior minister announced that a summary to this effect has been sent to the prime minister’s office.
However, leading human rights bodies and experts warn that such a measure would not only further infringe on fundamental privacy rights, but was also likely to be misused by the police force, where corrupt practices are said to be endemic.
Interior Minister Rehman Malik had said on March 13 that
a summary was forwarded to the prime minister to grant police access to mobile phone data. He added that ‘special equipment’ for the purpose would also be provided to police across the country to find the location of criminals and that a central crime database centre would also be set up in Islamabad.
But does this mean that the police would also have the added capacity of wiretapping conversations? A leading telecommunication expert, who did not wish to be named, said that the technology that gives access to mobile phone data and the location of a suspect could easily be used to also wiretap the conversation.
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan’s senior council member Asad Butt warned that these extensions in the powers of the police on the pretext of curbing crime could be grossly misused. “One only has to look at the past record of the police to realise that giving them blanket access to mobile phone records is a bad idea.”
Butt stressed that by law even intelligence agencies have to first get permission from the courts before they conduct surveillance on anyone. “The police too must first be told to get the permission of the courts before they begin accessing mobile phone records.”
According to the Pakistan Telecommunications Act of 1996, the government can “authorise any person or persons to intercept calls and messages or to trace calls through any telecommunication system” for the purposes of defending ‘national security’.
The legality of wiretapping was discussed extensively by a full bench of the Supreme Court in the Benazir Bhutto v Federation of Pakistan case in 1998, in which the dissolution of Bhutto’s second government was challenged.
Justice Saleem Akhtar’s authored judgment said that since there was no procedure for regulating wiretapping of private or official phones, to prevent against the violation of constitutionally protected rights phones could only be tapped with the prior permission of either the Supreme Court or a commission constituted by the apex court which was to examine each case on its merits. Going a step further, the judgment implied that the court’s permission was also required in cases involving national security.
However, the procedure specified was never implemented and intelligence agencies do not seek the court’s permission before wiretapping anyone.
The HRCP senior member feared that the extension in powers of the police would hit the business community the most since corrupt officers within the police would use this facility in extorting money from respectable businessmen by finding out about their deals rather than curbing crime.
Analyst Amir Rana also voiced his opinion against the measure. “Before the police get any such access, a foolproof mechanism must first be developed that ensures that officers would be held accountable if it is misused.” Otherwise, he warned, this new power would become another lucrative avenue for them to collect bribes.
Meanwhile, Sharfuddin Memon, an adviser to the Sindh chief minister, defended the police and welcomed Malik’s announcement for access to mobile phone data. “If everybody is worried about police misuse, then are they not worried about how the intelligence agencies are using their facility of tracing and wiretapping individuals?”
SP Central Investigation Agency Lahore Liaqat Malik said if the measure is implemented it would be a huge boost to fighting crime and terrorism throughout the country. “The Police are at the forefront of fighting crime and terrorism and yet we are dependent on intelligence agencies for granting us access to mobile phone intercepts, and they may or may not give it to us on their discretion.”
Published in The Express Tribune, March 17th, 2012.
COMMENTS (11)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
bad and dangerous move.
Police is the biggest part of the problem in Pakistan for Law & order. The sheer pervasiveness of corruption in this force is unimaginable. Phone tapping is violation of individual human right & can not be allowed to be used by Police. However law enforcing agencies who are directly fighting against terrorism should have access to this facility with some form of checks. More cohesiveness & coordination among all agencies to be effective against this menace. We need massive reforms in Police to improve law and order in our country which includes merit, professionalism, best salaries to attract best among us & de-politicization.
The title should have been: Does police in Pakistan need any legal sanction or moral allowance to do what they wish to do? A force developed on the Irish Constabulary and not the London Metropolitan Police model, must do what it can and we need to reconcile with our titles of being subjects rather than tax paying citizens must suffer what we have to. Entering into an intellectual argument with "Dr" Rahman Malik will be like passing resolutions in favour of vegetarianism with wolf entertaining a different opinion.
completely agree with pagal & afghan karachite..
the cops wouldnt even have to stand on roadside for extortion, they would simply plug-in this new equipment late night, listen to the young people er chatting, note down their contact info & blackmail them (aap k waldain ko bta dain gay or sth)
No first end the political interference in the police system then this access should be granted, but to fulfill first condition is impossible at all
With the Internet censorship and now this, the future of our country's citizens reminds me of what the Chinese had to go through (and still are!). What are they going to do next? One-child policy?
Whenever the police stops me at a checkpoint, I feel the same thing I felt when I was stopped by a gang of robbers - impending doom. Yes, doom. Because they will go to great lengths just to blackmail you into paying them a bribe. (Where are you coming from? Where are you going? Where do you work? License? Registration? Owner's authority letter? Taxes paid? Well that's good you have everything, but your number plate is incorrect and we will have to impound your vehicle. Unless...)
Also, when the robbers kidnapped me and drove me around the city, a small motorcade with one MNA car and two Police mobiles tried to pass us on Shahrah-e-Faisal. I was trying to get their attention by not letting them take over - I wanted them to stop me - but they were too busy 'protecting' some guy who has, in all likelihood, never seen an honest rupee.
You want these guys to get access to my phone calls? Bite me.
The day when the Police are given access to wiretap phone conversation - will be the day saying good bye to my cellphone.
I don't want people to listen to my conversation with my spouse on youtube - absolutely NOT!
This is a clear violation of privacy. And given the track record of our police this will surely cause a lot more harm to ordinary citizens than it will benefit anybody.
This will lead to Black Mailing to by Police Nothing will change in this country
Rather than "importing" American concepts of free speech, religious freedom and democracy to Pakistan--we're bringing home the Patriot Act. How convenient.