For ship breakers at Gaddani, constant fear of death

With no one willing to take responsibility, workers can only afford to buy old, faulty gear that offers no protection.


Reuters February 27, 2012

GADDANI: Mehdi Hassan was clinging to a greasy rope, toiling high inside the hull of an oil tanker, when he became another victim of lax safety standards at Pakistan’s Gaddani ship breaking yard.    

He suddenly slipped and fell to the floor in the dark. Unable to move all night with broken bones, and with no one around to help, he choked to death on toxic fumes.

“A steel section was cut out from the ship and when it fell into the sea, light came into the hull and we saw Mehdi’s body. His face was bloated, purple and green,” said Mohammad Saleem, one of the workers who found Hassan.

“The next morning we had to work as if nothing had happened. We are treated like dogs and the owners don’t care if we die.”

Fifteen thousand impoverished Pakistanis risk their lives every day, tearing down ships at Gaddani beach on the Arabian Sea coast, a 10 km-long death trap. They earn as little as $4 a day.

Any second a giant steel plate can fall and crush dozens of people at a time. High tension cables often snap and decapitate. Deadly chemicals can slowly kill workers.

Dozens died last year disembowelling vessels at an astonishing pace at the ship breaking yard, one of the biggest in the world. All kinds of ageing vessels – from Japanese ore carriers to Italian passenger ferries – are run ashore for scrapping.

A global downturn in shipping means more vessels are expected to land here, increasing the chances of fatal accidents. Activists worry the boom will encourage further disregard of safety and environmental guidelines.

“Ship breaking companies make a lot of money but don’t do anything to help or protect the workers that make it possible for them to earn so much,” said Nasir Mansoor, a representative of the National Trade Union Federation of Pakistan.

“Millions of dollars, and yet there is no pressure on them to even provide clean drinking water and helmets to their workers. This is a national shame.”

Safety and environment regulations exist in Pakistan. Ship-breaking companies are supposed to provide protective equipment like helmets and gloves, and arrange for the safe handling of toxic materials. But they are seldom enforced.

The cash-strapped government is unlikely to clamp down hard on Gaddani because it is a rare economic success story in a country where many industries are crippled by power cuts, a lack of foreign investment and security threats from militants.

Salvaging almost a million tonnes of steel a year, Gaddani is the third largest ship breaking yard in the world. Metal from the yard is sold to mills across Pakistan, meeting about 70 per cent of the country’s steel requirement in 2011.

Profits for ship breakers vary with fluctuating steel prices, but Pakistani tax officials estimated ship breaking companies’ average revenue per vessel at over $4.5 million in the 2011/12 financial year.

“We do what we can. We are trying to provide better safety and health facilities to workers at Gaddani but we also have to look at our budget,” said Nur Kibzai, a labour official.

Another official, who requested anonymity because he was not authorised to speak to the media, told Reuters that the scale of the ship breaking industry also prevents the government from taking stronger action.

“We need to be careful with how we approach enforcement for an industry like this because we need to promote it for two reasons; it brings in substantial revenue and it employs thousands,” the official said.

Apocalyptic site

Historically, ships were broken down at home bases where they were built, before high costs and safety and environmental laws drove the business to less strict developing countries.

Each year around 800 ships are sent to breaking yards, with about 80 per cent ending up on South Asian maritime graveyards like Gaddani, according to Shipbreaking Platform, a non-governmental coalition of human rights organisations.

Workers in torn overalls that easily catch fire risk their lives just walking through the yard – an apocalyptic mix of rusty machinery, jagged-edged steel and giant ship engines on the oil-stained shore.

Apprentice Abdul Rab, 20, is still haunted by the whipping sound he heard just before a cable sliced a co-worker in half. “It was so quick that he didn’t even get a chance to scream,” he said.

Today, ship breaking companies in Pakistan, India and Bangladesh – the industry leaders – are vying for more vessels as intense competition between them drives wages even lower.

Labourers at Gaddani who used to make $6 a day are now putting in the same hours for $4, a tough drop in the face of rising costs in Pakistan, especially for basic items like food.

A shortage of jobs in Pakistan means young men like Zardad Khan, 18, will keep flocking to Gaddani, knowing they could die on the job. “This isn’t work for human beings,” Khan said, standing on top of the carcass of a South Korean grain ship.

Dangerous chemicals

When falling objects don’t kill workers, dangerous chemicals like mercury and lead do.

The European Commission estimates that 40,000 to 1.3 million tonnes of toxic materials on derelict ships are exported each year to South Asia from Europe alone.

Chemicals leak from the ships, staining the sea water and sand around the work space. Scores of workers suffer from skin and respiratory diseases as a result.

“When I am inside the ship using the cutter, often the smoke from chemicals makes me cough and I can’t breathe,” said Daud Khan, 16, his arms scarred by burns. “Many nights, I stay up coughing and there is blood.”

Rizwan Farooqi, chairman of the Pakistan Ship Breakers Association, acknowledged the dangers. But he says it’s up to the government to improve safety standards.

“Safety is an issue, and it is something we are trying to improve. But it is mainly the government’s task to ensure this,” he said.         “The authorities still haven’t set up proper electricity or water infrastructure. We have to do that ourselves.”

With no one willing to take responsibility, workers can only afford to buy old, faulty gear that offers no protection against catastrophes like one in November: three labourers cutting sections of a ship’s fuel tank were burned alive when vapour exploded.

“We ran towards the explosion but we knew they were dead even before we got there,” said worker Allah Ditta. “When the fire was finally put out, there was nothing left of them.”

COMMENTS (9)

Irshad Khan | 12 years ago | Reply It is very sad that no humanist or its NGO has taken interest in this very pathetic affair. If somebody has seen the ship breaking site, he might imagine, to some extent, that how the hell like conditions prevail there and a person working there is exposed to extreme type of life danger and that also in very miserable and dirtiest possible conditions. But people accept that type of work just because they have no other work to do and have to feed their families. If anybody is interested I can suggest minimum possible safety gadgets and some remedial treatment of injured persons at site as I have a long experience of such Industrial safety measures. We can involve some NGO/philanthropist to help in supplying safety equipment to these labours/site owners. All this work will be on voluntary basis and without involving any type of politics or politicians.
Irshad Khan | 12 years ago | Reply

There are safety rules and laws applicable to all Industrial and productive units. But I have neither seen nor heard its sincere implementation or snap checking by any authority.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ