“If money belonging to the people is looted from them and stashed away in accounts in Swiss banks, will the nation not demand that this money is returned to them?” Nawaz said at a joint news conference with Mumtaz Bhutto, chairman of the Sindh National Front (SNF) Mumtaz Bhutto.
The statement comes hours after the Supreme Court framed contempt of court charges against Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, for failing to write a letter to Swiss authorities despite court instructions in the NRO case.
Talking about the letter, which has become a bone of contention between the judiciary and the government, Nawaz said that the people must be explained what the significance of this letter is. The letter, he said, should say that this money belongs to the people of Pakistan and it is their demand that this money is brought back to their country. “The money will only be brought back if this letter is written. So why is the government unwilling to write this letter and bring the money to Pakistan?”
In a clear reference to President Asif Ali Zardari, Nawaz said that nobody in the country is willing to accept that one man who has looted all this money and refuses to bring it back is allowed to go scot-free while a prime minister becomes his scapegoat. “It must be clarified to the people what the government is committed to: the country or corruption? The prime minister has also taken oath under the constitution and should be clear on which side he is on.”
Coalition partners
Responding to a question, Nawaz said that in supporting the government in its refusal to write the infamous letter, the coalition partners are behaving irresponsibly. “This move is completely against the aspirations of the Pakistani people and it is because of the allies’ support that the government feels that it can get away. The coalition parts, therefore, must reconsider what they are doing.”
Severely criticising the coalition partners, he said that their support to the government in this matter was unconstitutional and illegal. “Not only are they siding with the government, they are also accusing the judiciary of being partisan.”
Supporting the judiciary
The judiciary, he said, is being unfairly blamed for being partial. “Does the ordinary Pakistani citizen not want that this money is returned? That’s what the Supreme Court is also saying and hence asking for the letter to be written. Is it, then, saying something unjust?”
On the matter of presidential immunity, he said that the Supreme Court will better decide on the issue but in his view, immunity or no immunity, the people’s money must be returned to them. “The nation does not care about immunity. Even a person like me doesn’t understand it. It is the nation’s money, it should first be returned to its rightful owners and then we will talk about immunity.”
Dodging a question about whether the PML-N will take to the streets if the government-judiciary showdown continues, he said that the entire nation is with the judiciary on the matter. “The government is responsible and it has committed crimes, but is trying to blame the judiciary. This is unacceptable.”
Commenting on Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan’s recent statements about the PML-N, Nawaz said that those who really yearn for change do not join hands people from the status quo. “He doesn’t welcome people who are responsible for where Pakistan is today. Politicians should not have double standards.”
Asked about boycotting elections, he said that the PML-N has always maintained that it will only boycott elections if the Pakistan Peoples Party does so. “I have said since the London all-parties conference that for an effective boycott, all parties must refuse to participate in polls.”
Mumtaz Bhutto meeting
Earlier, Bhutto said that in the meeting, he and Nawaz discussed what can be a new direction for an immediate change in the dismal situation of the country. “We must search and find a solution.”
He said that there is a consensus among all political parties that this government cannot be expected to hold free and fair elections, which is why the 20th amendment has been brought in the assembly. “We discussed the formation of an interim government and its mandate,” Bhutto said.
To a question of a possible alliance between his and Nawaz’s parties, he said that his party’s reach is limited to Sindh and it operates on a one-point agenda that Pakistan should become a confederation, implying that the two parties had different agendas.
COMMENTS (20)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1732434981-0/BeFunky-collage-(10)1732434981-0-405x300.webp "article")
1732429143-0/BeFunk_§_]__-(44)1732429143-0.jpg "mobile internet services disrupted in karachi")
1732428532-0/BeFunk_§_]__-(43)1732428532-0.jpg "train operations halted between lahore rawalpindi peshawar amid pti protest")
1732427746-0/Copy-of-Untitled-(2)1732427746-0-270x192.webp "flood damaged water channels restored in balochistan")
The chief justice’s explication of the guiding judicial principle that “the courts must not act as an Opposition to the government” similarly sets another confine of the court realm. In a speech CJP said that the government had failed in its responsibility. The Opposition, obviously, also has been pronouncing the same. Thus the courts have to be more circumspect not to blur the lines as they certainly have a right to comment on the efficiency of the functionaries involved in any particular case under their consideration yet a pervasive blanket disapproval of the government at an out of court entrants event is certainly beyond their boundaries. The executive is an embodiment of the aspirations of the electorate — it has to submit to their evaluation and to command a continuous confidence of their parliament. Any certificate for their conduct and performance by the superior courts constitutes neither a condition nor a criterion for their success or failure. This evidently also restricts the courts’ incursions to curtail the executive authority such as fixing of sugar prices or the recent lightning command for a commitment not to sack the two commanders.
If a man looks like a confused soul, walks like a confused soul and quacks like a confused soul, he is a confused soul.
now he throws his weight? what about the 3 years when he was buddy buddy with zardari. was he not aware of the nro then? Nawaz is a spent force.
Just like he did with the memogate fiasco, then when it came to crunch time he ran away to london!!
Rest assured Mian Ji, Whatever they do, it will be better than what you did with the supreme court when you were in power.
Mian sb's well known habbit, hide and seek
@sunny do not worry about Mr.sharif what he is losing, he knows better about himself, he is playing good role save the country.
Now pretty soon NRO will be issued for granting immunity from probe in respect of investment made in stock exchange?. This country needs major change in it's mindset
It is a losing bet Mr Sharif. Your weight is not always winning - you have lost credibility and vote bank and let opportunists (like Imran Khan) to drive in. Had you been a thinking man you could have make a difference.
This is appropriate time to avoid the path of anti-democracy slogan – off the people, far the people and buy the people – please keep in scenario the end of Nixon Watergate Scandal Indira Gandhi decision pronounced by the Allahbad High court in 1980.
It is pot calling the other pot black, we still recall your attitude on judicary & how did you get the decision of your choice .
One shudders to think what PMLN would have done if instead of Gilani, today Nawaz Sharif had to appear before the Supreme Court in the contempt of court case. If history is any guide to go by, it wouldn't have been peaceful!
Yeah, it'll be good for him to shed some of that "weight" before all that load that he carries becomes naturally useless deadweight.
Nawaz Sharif will soon realize CJ IMC is strengthening same establishment that forced him out and weakening same political class that brought him back. Miyan Saab is next in line, Mehran-gate. Let's see if SC can indict Kiyani and Pasha on contempt of court on missing persons.
Mian Sahib's politics has been always behind some institution. Earlier it was military, now it is judiciary. He has done worst this time by eroding public trust on judicial system!
Why he forgets his own term when was faced with same situation. Acts speak more loudly than wrods. At least PP is showing cooperation and patience to justice. As said " Pehlay Tolo Phir Bolo"
If the money will come back to Pakistan it will not benefit a common man.
The comman man wants justice in his or her individual case, not in the case of the Government.
Government can sustain losses, wehreas a common man cannot.
He should try to reduce his own weight rather than throwing it behind the Super Supreme Court and his own Lahore High Court.