Pakistani investigators due to visit India next month to probe the 2008 Mumbai attacks will not be allowed to interrogate Ajmal Kasab, The Associated Press news agency reported on Monday.
Disagreements over access to the lone surviving gunman, who has been sentenced to death in India for his role in the rampage that killed 166, have spilled into public view.
Interior Minister Rehman Malik told India’s NDTV last week that Pakistani officials would like to speak with Kasab directly to verify his confession.
“It can be verified either by bringing Kasab to Pakistan or the judicial commission goes and personally interviews witnesses, including Kasab,” he said. “That’s what we have requested.”
But on Monday, Ira Joshi, a spokeswoman for India’s Ministry of Home Affairs, said that such access was not part of the memorandum of understanding governing the visit.
In his confession before the court — which he later tried to retract — Kasab described in detail a network of training camps and safe houses across Pakistan, revealing the names of four men he said were his handlers.
The Pakistani delegation will visit Mumbai in the first week of February and speak to doctors who conducted post-mortems on the nine gunmen killed during the attack, as well as to the magistrate who recorded Kasab’s confession and the chief investigating officer of the attacks, an official at Mumbai’s high court said on condition of anonymity because of the confidential nature of the visit.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 24th, 2012.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Babar Cyprus: Here is another link for you to peruse, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Headley It will explain the christian leader to you.
@Babar Cyprus You are duplicious to the extreme.You surely hold a brief,but when confronted,take another route.May be elusive is a better word.
Ok Kids! Here it is, to start with(looks like India keep you guys in total darkness), I mean nationalism should not mean hiding the facts:
"Mumbai Terrorist Attacks: US Man Charged [Excerpt: "Headley was arrested by the FBI in October as he prepared to board a plane in Chicago bound for Pakistan."] Guardian December 8, 2009 by Ewen MacAskill .......Smoke and flames pour from the Taj Mahal Hotel in Mumbai. Photograph: AFP/Getty Images"..........
For more: http://www.actforamerica.org/index.php/learn/recent-news/10-newsmaster/1736-mumbai-terrorist-attacks-us-man-charged
@Babar Cyprus: Come Now, don't be shy, Tell all of us who the "American christian leader of Mumbai Attacks" is, or did you just make that up to feel important!
@numbersnumber: I wish I had time and interest in spending more time on net for you, but now that you are here why not start typing your concerned titles on the browser and start do your research.
@Babar Cyprus: WOW, "American christian leader of Mumbai attacks"! Please tell us who this "leader" is and how you know he is the "leader"? In case you don't follow the Pakistani news, looking up the 26/11 incident on Wikipedia relates in part the following " In July 2009 Pakistani authorities confirmed that LeT plotted and financed the attacks from LeT camps in Karachi and Thatta. In November 2009, Pakistani authorities charged seven men they had arrested earlier, of planning and executing the assault."
Why not? If India could visit & interview the American christian leader of Mumbai Attacks several times in a week in U.S but still play politics with Pakistan and local masses why can't Pakistan meet the person India is saying is a Pakistani agent. Is there something to hide from Pak?