Presidential immunity can be termed 'discriminatory': Aitzaz

Aitzaz Ahsan says federal government can write letter if President Asif Ali Zardari resigns.


Web Desk January 23, 2012

LAHORE: Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan, PPP stalwart and prime minister’s counsel in the contempt of court case, has reiterated his stance on the immunity given to the president by the Constitution.

When asked about Article 248 of the Constitution, which gives immunity to the president is a discriminatory law, Ahsan said that it can termed as one, however, the article cannot be removed without a constitutional amendment.

“The immunity is not for a person, it is for the post... The very next day the president resigns, the federal government can write a letter against him,” he added.

Ahsan had been requested to represent Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani after the premier was issued a contempt of court notice by the Supreme Court over not writing a letter to Swiss authorities to reopen graft cases against President Asif Ali Zardari.

Since the issuance of the contempt notice, the lawyer has been of the view that the president enjoys immunity all over the world, and thus the prime minister did not go against the court’s orders by not writing the letter.

This stance was put forward both by Gilani and his counsel during the hearing of the case on January 19 in the Supreme Court.

When asked about Article 248 of the Constitution, which gives immunity to the president is a discriminatory law, Ahsan said that it can termed as one, however, the article cannot be removed without a constitutional amendment.

“The immunity is not for a person, it is for the post... The very next day the president resigns, the federal government can write a letter against him,” he added.

Ahsan had been requested to represent Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani after the premier was issued a contempt of court notice by the Supreme Court over not writing a letter to Swiss authorities to reopen graft cases against President Asif Ali Zardari.

Since the issuance of the contempt notice, the lawyer has been of the view that the president enjoys immunity all over the world, and thus the prime minister did not go against the court’s orders by not writing the letter.

This stance was put forward both by Gilani and his counsel during the hearing of the case on January 19 in the Supreme Court.

COMMENTS (3)

Sajjad Ashraf | 12 years ago | Reply

Mr.Ahsan-please? If NRO is illegal ab initio how do you justify Mr.Zardari's candidacy and subsequent election to the Presidency. Don't engage into a lawyers rhetoric. This nation cannot take more of this burden.

Mohammad Ali Siddiqui | 12 years ago | Reply

One should read the relevant clauses of the Constitution of Pakistan before discussing the immunity grated to the President while he is on duty.

Every one knows that the President under the constitution enjoys immunity then why so many eyebrows are raised when it came to the immunity enjoyed by President Asif Ali Zardari.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ