“A renewal of the licence depends on a thorough review of the plant’s performance,” said Zaheer Ayub Baig, the director-general of the Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority (PNRA). “We will also take into account the international standards and their implementation at Kanupp before taking a decision.”
The 80-megawatt Kanupp declared a temporary emergency on Wednesday morning after a pipe carrying heavy water to the reactor leaked leading to fears that radiation had spread. “A heavy water spill is a matter of routine,” said Ayub. “These plants are designed considering that such problems will occur.”
PNRA has no reports about radioactivity in the heavy water exceeding the permissible limit, he said. “We have already taken a lot of precautions and one of those is that Kanupp won’t produce more than 80 MW.”
Kanupp, which is located 15 miles from Karachi on the Arabian coast, started operations in late 1972. It completed its 30-year life span in 2002 and since has been upgraded. But the plant is slated to be decommissioned by 2016, when the extension expires.
Baig said that radiation was enough to be contained by just a thin film of plastic. He did not say if there are any plans to decommission the plant.
However, a Kanupp official who asked not to be named said that management was reviewing ways to upgrade the facility so that it can operate for two to three more years.
“There was some level of radiation but nothing to worry about,” said Kanupp spokesman Tariq Rashid. “I can’t state the quantity of heavy water that was leaked. We don’t quantify that.”
A heavy water leak in the plant during a maintenance procedure pushed authorities to declare an emergency and evacuate employees from the affected site. “It could have suffered extensive damage if the plant was running,” said a Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) official.
Employees have since gone back to work. There have been no reports of injuries. Around 1,700 people work at the plant, which has been shut for most of the time in the last decade.
Karachi University Pro-Vice Chancellor Shahana Kazmi commented that gathering facts about radioactive leaks remains difficult in the absence of any independent monitoring system in the country. “If the radioactive content is high then water can be contaminated and mutate marine life,” she said. “People who live in nearby villages can also be exposed to radiation. It directly affects the DNA and can cause multiple illnesses.”
Chances of heavy water leaks rise as the plant ages, she said. “We must work on a strong monitoring system for the sake of public safety.”
“Whether or not a [radioactive] leak occurs in the water or the atmosphere, it is harmful for both human as well as marine life,” was the opinion of Dr Jamal Pirzada, who runs the Centre of Excellence in Marine Biology at the University of Karachi. “Of course even if it occurs in the sea it can affect us through the food chain.”
When radioactive material enters the sea and is consumed by smaller sea animals such as shrimp or small fish, the magnitude of radioactivity multiplies 10 times in the sea animal which eats it. This process continues with the radioactive intensity increasing each time. Eventually when some of these fish or shrimp end up on dinner plates, they can prove very damaging to biological systems. They may even have effects as severe as cancer, he explained.
Of course, to some extent, the sea can dilute the radioactive substance but it depends on the dose and the nature of the substance. What ends up happening is that radioactive content in the sea raises the temperature of the water by a few degrees. “Fish and other moveable marine life not liking the change may leave almost immediately. However, other attached or unmovable marine life, such as corals, end up getting damaged and bleached over time.” Calling corals the rainforest of the sea, Pirzada said, “This is a sheer loss of biodiversity.” Corals are present in the water surrounding Charna Island near Kannup.
with additional reporting by Mahnoor Sherazee & adil jawad
Published in The Express Tribune, October 21st, 2011.
COMMENTS (33)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
The concerns are justified but, this is directed at people who may overreact. One bright side to having a lot of self serving and selfish officials is that they're self serving and selfish. Their safety is on the line as well and it raises severity for anyone actually in the plant. I'm not saying anyone who is concerned shouldn't be or those speaking out about it should stop. I'm just saying don't get yourselves worked up into a panic. They'll save their own lives in the end and that action will also save the lives of others even if it is indirectly.
@let there be peace: just a rumour....nuclear power plants do not produce "explosions" to cause quakes.....
It cost an enormous sum of money to properly decommission a nuclear reactor and it's one of the things that is often ignored by those who think nuclear energy is inexpensive. The reactor is past its normal service life and Pakistan is now faced with some tough choices - spend the money to properly/safely close down the facility - spend the money to keep the reactor limping along - or cut some corners and keep your fingers crossed. Lets hope Pakistan doesn't do the later.
@ Let there be peace:
There are no nuclear power plants in Gilgit-Baltistan.
Shut it down, now! 80 ms of power at what risk. Plants 40 years old.
@A.Khan: "Pakistan is no Japan but you dont know the maintenance skill people in Pakistan. Some of them are really world’s best."
It is due to the world class maintenance skills that 1) 33% of PIA airplanes are unable to fly 2) Just today a PIA flight with 500+ HAjj pilgrims was certified as airworthy even though its machine had failed. It was the alertness of passengers who smelt something thatpreventd a mishap. 3) Pakistan Railways has stopped carrying cargo (which is the most lucrative segment for it). This is because the locomotives have not been repaired for months.
@Salman: "Noted that this was designed for 30years and that was 5 years ago , the authorities should relocate it some where else remote."
I agree with your general thought process. But the situation is worse than what you outlined. The 30 years for which it was designed got over in 2002. It was upgraded to extend life by 5 years i.e. 2007. So this is already 4 years past the technical obsolescence date and yet some spokesperson is saying there is no problem in continuing it for 4 more years i.e. 2015.
Why keep outdated nuclear plant with small capacity in a huge city like Karachi? . When there was earthquake in Kashmir a few years ago I had read once, nuclear plants in Gilgit Baltistan had developed cracks and so this area was completely closed to media and aid agencies. Never heard anything later about it. Does anyone knows anything about it; or was it just a rumor?
Incompetence displayed again. A Nation that cannot run a simple railway engine tries to run stolen nuke plants.
@ashok sai: Pakistan is no Japan but you dont know the maintenance skill people in Pakistan. Some of them are really world's best. I have worked with them as well as foreign counterparts. Just not sure if KANNUPP has this skill
Conspiracy theorists and N-Bomb Natioalists! for God's sake, save your musings for some other innocent matter. Nuclear disaster is no child's game and the prospects make me shudder.
Good to see indian commenting is busy here on this news
We recently read an ET article which indicates the national airline uses substandard parts which contributes to the fact that 1/3 of the fleet isn't flying. Let's hope that the govt is doing a better job at maintaining the nuclear reactors than the airplanes. Corruption, poor maintenance, and a reputation for disingenuous statements is a bad combination. Pubic safety demands an independent United Nations review of the true state of these reactors.
Hindu Zionists are behind it
When the govt has little credibility even small events like this make one wonder about what really happened. Like sovereignty - nuclear power requires responsibility.
With a large percentage of radicalized individuals amongst their workforce, this is not a coincidence. However, the attitude is still sweeping it under the rug, even at the cost of the lives of their own people.
@ashok sai: Dont worry my indian friends, this will not damage you. Worry about number of nuclear reactor is growing in your own country.
I don't even understand things are getting from bad to worse.
Minor leakage in a nuclear power plant....IS STILL LEAKAGE FROM A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT!!!!!
I am kinda scratching my head at the timing of this incident, are we looking at a sabotage or what?
@H Q: i second that!
"No damage has been reported" Deny it till a baby with two heads and one eye is born in the effected area.
'Leakage? What leakage? No need to worry. Its heavy water. It wont move'. Dr. Rehman Malik.
@Diggvijay Singh:
"Made in china"
Singh, for the first time you have spoken without bias against Pakistan. I would like to Thank you. :)
I hope things are brought under control at the earliest.
Chernobyl in the making!
Why us...Why Pakistan? :(
oh my God! How could you say no damage?
Only a matter of time before another decrepit Pakistani institution fails. What's next, the PIA, railway, wapda, sui gas? Oh right they're already down the drain.
Thing to remember is, Pakistan is no Japan, usual denial won't help and it will be suicidal also. Sensitive technologies like this goes well with economically viable nations. To produce 80 MW, is it worth to play with lives ?
This is nothing but a minor leak which needs to be ignored. American and Israeli intelligence services had previously conspired to level grave allegations of much more serious nuclear leakage from Pakistan. But much to their embarrassment, their allegations turned out to be hollow and unsubstantiated due to the lack of solid evidence which could stand the test of rigorous scrutiny in a Pakistani court. Due to a squeaky clean non-proliferation record till date Pakistan was conferred the head position in the governing board of UN's nuclear watchdog IAEA in 2010.