TODAY’S PAPER | May 08, 2026 | EPAPER

Pride, reflection and the future of Pashtun identity

.


M Zeb Khan May 08, 2026 3 min read
The writer holds PhD in Administrative Sciences and teaches at the University of Plymouth, UK; email: zeb.khan@plymouth.ac.uk

Few identities carry as much pride as that of the Pashtun. We speak of honour, courage, hospitality and dignity not as abstract ideals but as lived values and daily experiences - passed down through generations, embedded in our poetry, and reflected in our social codes. To be Pashtun is, for many of us, not just an identity but a moral claim. And yet, it is precisely because this identity matters so much that it must be questioned - honestly and without defensiveness.

If we truly believe in the strength of our tradition, then we must ask: why has it not produced, in recent decades, more individuals of the intellectual and moral stature of Bacha Khan, Khushal Khan Khattak and Ghani Khan? These were not merely proud Pashtuns; they were reflective ones. Bacha Khan challenged violence within his own society and made education the centre of reform. Khushal Khan Khattak linked freedom with dignity and self-awareness. Ghani Khan questioned rigid thinking and invited his people toward introspection and humanism.

They did not weaken Pashtun identity by questioning it; they strengthened it. Today, however, we often do the opposite. We defend identity more than we develop it. Across both Pakistan and Afghanistan, Pashtun identity is frequently expressed through visible symbols - language, lineage, customs and codes of honour. These are important. But when identity becomes primarily about preservation rather than evolution, it begins to stagnate. Pride turns into repetition. Culture becomes performance. A society that stops questioning itself eventually stops growing.

This is not to deny the difficult realities we face - decades of conflict, political marginalisation, economic hardship and external interference. These have undeniably shaped our trajectory. But if we attribute everything to external forces, we risk ignoring an equally important truth: renewal must also come from within. And nowhere is this internal challenge more urgent than in our approach to knowledge and education as it essentially determines the destiny of a people today.

Historically, Pashtun society has produced poets, thinkers and reformers. Yet today, we struggle to produce individuals who lead in science, philosophy or global intellectual discourse. This is not because of a lack of ability, but because of a lack of enabling environments - spaces where questioning is encouraged, critical thinking is valued, and intellectual effort is rewarded. Instead, too often, conformity is preferred over curiosity. This inward stagnation becomes even more visible - and more troubling - when we look at the condition of women.

In parts of our society, and most starkly under the rule of the Taliban in Afghanistan, restrictions on girls' education and women's participation are justified in the name of religion and culture. These policies are often presented as a defence of identity - as if honour depends on limiting the freedom of women. But this is a profound contradiction. A society that denies education to its daughters cannot claim to value knowledge. A culture that restricts the growth of women cannot claim to uphold dignity.

This is not about adopting external values or abandoning tradition. It is about recognising that no tradition can remain strong if it refuses to grow. Even within our own history, figures like Bacha Khan placed education - including for women - at the centre of social progress. They understood that dignity without development is incomplete. If we are serious about preserving Pashtun identity, then we must ask a more difficult question: are we preserving its form or its spirit?

The spirit of any living culture lies not in rigid repetition, but in its capacity to adapt, to reflect, and to renew itself. This requires a shift - from pride to introspection, from certainty to humility, and from judgement to compassion. It means creating space for disagreement without labelling it disloyalty. It means valuing those who question as much as those who conform. It means recognising that strength is not just the ability to defend identity, but the willingness to refine it. The future of the Pashtun people will not be determined by how loudly we assert who we are but by how thoughtfully we shape who we are becoming.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ