TODAY’S PAPER | April 22, 2026 | EPAPER

FCC questions Imran 'Release Force'

Petition says K-P CM's plan breaches law; court seeks response in 10 days


Hasnaat Malik April 02, 2026 2 min read
Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Sohail Afridi addresses a jirga in Peshawar on Monday. SCREENGRAB

ISLAMABAD:

The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) has sought a response from Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Sohail Afridi within ten days regarding the formation of PTI founder Imran Khan's "release force".

A three-judge bench of the FCC, led by Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan, on Wednesday took up a petition filed by Islamabad-based advocate Malik Zaheer Ahmed.

The petition seeks a declaration that the formation or mobilisation of the so-called "Imran Khan release/rihai force" is prohibited, and that any attempt to constitute, organise, or mobilise such a private force or militia would be illegal, unconstitutional, and in violation of Articles 5, 17, and 256 of the Constitution, as well as the Private Military Organisations (Abolition and Prohibition) Act, 1973.

Advocate Ali Nawaz Kharal is representing the petitioner before the FCC.

After the Eid vacations, the FCC has taken up two petitions that could impact the interests of the PTI, particularly that of the K-P chief minister.

Last week, the FCC heard a petition seeking the transfer of the May 9 case from Peshawar to Islamabad or any other province. Afridi is accused in the case, which relates to the May 10, 2023 attack on Radio Pakistan Peshawar.

The FCC also stayed the proceedings of the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) Peshawar in the same case. It has now taken up a petition challenging the proposed "release force".

During the hearing, Justice Aminuddin observed that no "release force" should be formed for a convicted individual.

Another judge, Justice Ali Baqar Najfi, asked whether the K-P cabinet had approved the formation of the "release force". The counsel responded that the cabinet had not granted permission.

According to the petition, the K-P chief minister on February 18 made a public statement—widely circulated in print, electronic, and social media—announcing the intention to form a force described as the "Imran Khan Release Force", also referred to as the "Imran Khan Rehai Force", aimed at securing the PTI founder's release, who is incarcerated in connection with various criminal cases and has convictions upheld by competent courts.

The petitioner expressed concern that similar terminology used in the past by political parties had led to the emergence—or at least the perception—of militant wings linked to them, including groups such as the Al-Zulfiqar Organization historically associated with the Pakistan Peoples Party, and militant elements previously attributed to the Muttahida Qaumi Movement.

The petition contends that Article 5 of the Constitution imposes a fundamental duty on every citizen—including public office holders—to remain loyal to the state and abide by the Constitution and the law, and any action contrary to this is ultra vires the Constitution.

COMMENTS (2)

Jawed | 2 weeks ago | Reply Well said The real threat to the state is this blatant weaponization of the judiciary itself.
Salman | 2 weeks ago | Reply The Federal Constitutional Court s FCC latest stunt dragging Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Sohail Afridi before it over the peaceful Imran Khan Rehai Force is not justice. It is a brazen partisan witch-hunt by a compromised bench terrified of popular will. This April 2 2026 move as reported exposes the FCC as a tool of selective repression rather than a guardian of the Constitution. Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan s arrogant declaration that no release force should be formed for a convicted individual drips with prejudice and reveals the court s predetermined guilt narrative. Enough with the charade. Let s rip apart this farce with cold facts. On February 18 2026 CM Afridi announced a lawful volunteer-based non-violent campaign involving PTI s student wing youth women and professionals. Its only mission organized peaceful public pressure to free Pakistan s most popular leader Imran Khan imprisoned in Adiala Jail since August 2023 on a mountain of trumped-up politically engineered cases. The force would swear oaths of non-violence and disband instantly upon his release. This is not a militia it is basic democratic organizing. Yet the FCC egged on by a petition from an obscure advocate Malik Zaheer Ahmed hysterically invokes Articles 5 17 and 256 plus the 1973 Private Military Organisations Act equating it to Al-Zulfiqar or MQM militant wings. What a pathetic hypocritical stretch. Where is the evidence of arms violence or paramilitary training Nowhere. The court itself admitted no provincial cabinet approval was even needed for what is essentially a party volunteer network. Justice Ali Baqar Najfi s nitpicking on cabinet approval only highlights how desperate the bench is to manufacture a crisis. Article 17 explicitly protects the right to form associations and unions. Article 16 safeguards freedom of assembly. Article 256 bans private armies not peaceful registration drives or awareness campaigns. Twisting these provisions to criminalize citizens demanding fair justice is judicial tyranny plain and simple. The real outrage This same establishment turns a blind eye to actual militant histories of other parties but suddenly discovers constitutional violations when PTI dares to mobilize lawfully. Imran Khan is labeled convicted as if the term settles everything while ignoring the litany of procedural abuses denied bails overturned decisions health concerns dismissed and global condemnation labeling his detention as pure lawfare. The FCC s eagerness to pounce on this petition while issuing notices to KP government PTI federal government and ECP while ignoring far graver erosions of rule of law reeks of bias and political vendetta. Worse the FCC itself is tainted. Born from the controversial 26th Amendment it was widely slammed as a power-grab mechanism to muzzle opposition. Today s hearing confirms those warnings a court quick to harass an elected chief minister for channeling public frustration yet silent on the weaponization of institutions against the people s mandate.This isn t about upholding the Constitution. It s about crushing dissent and keeping a towering popular figure behind bars to protect a failing status quo. The Release Force threatens no one except those clinging to power through rigged cases and selective justice.CM Sohail Afridi and PTI should reject this intimidation outright. The people of Pakistan who have repeatedly shown their support for Imran Khan will not be silenced by judicial bullying. True fidelity to Article 5 means loyalty to the state and its people not loyalty to a vendetta that jails leaders and punishes their supporters for demanding basic rights. The FCC s panic move is not strength it is fear. History is littered with regimes that tried to suppress the people s voice through such tactics only to crumble. Pakistan deserves the immediate unconditional release of Imran Khan through fair process an end to this selective persecution and full respect for fundamental rights of association assembly and expression. The Release Force was always a peaceful call for justice. The real threat to the state is this blatant weaponization of the judiciary itself. Stand firm the tide of public sentiment cannot be jailed forever.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ