‘The Amazing Race’ stars Jonathan and Ana Towns sue CBS, Paramount and Jerry Bruckheimer for $8 million over defamation
Jonathan and Ana Towns file $8M defamation suit against CBS, Paramount and Jerry Bruckheimer Films

Jonathan Towns and Ana Rivera Towns, the third-place contestants from season 37 of the CBS series ‘The Amazing Race’ have filed an $8 million defamation lawsuit against World Race Productions, CBS, Paramount, ABC Signature, and Jerry Bruckheimer Films. The couple alleges the production falsely portrayed Jonathan as abusive, claiming the edited broadcast caused significant reputational, emotional, and professional harm.
Filmed from May to June 2024 and aired from March to May 2025, season 37 became the subject of the Towns’ legal action after they learned that Jonathan had been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder following filming. The couple asserts that his “behavioral manifestations” were not intentional cruelty but a result of his diagnosis, and that the producers deliberately edited the show to cast him in a negative light.
According to the Los Angeles Superior Court complaint, Jonathan and Ana claim the defendants ignored available evidence that would have accurately reflected Jonathan’s conduct, instead choosing a “constructed, false, and highly damaging portrayal.” Jonathan reportedly attempted to leave the competition due to the psychological toll of production, but was reassured by human resources that the race was being administered fairly and continued in reliance on that guidance.
The lawsuit describes the defendants’ alleged actions as a “smear strategy so audacious and immoral that would shock the conscience of even the most cynical propagandist.” Jonathan says the broadcast resulted in harassment, threats, and professional setbacks, while Ana reports reputational harm and emotional distress. Both continue to receive psychiatric and therapeutic treatment as a result of their experience on the show.
The Towns are representing themselves and have requested a jury trial, seeking compensatory and punitive damages, injunctive relief, and any other remedies available under the law. Paramount has offered no comment on the matter, while the couple and other parties involved have yet to provide public statements. The case highlights ongoing questions about reality TV production, editing practices, and the ethical responsibility of networks toward participants.


















COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ