Donors skittish as UN launches aid appeal

Prime minister wraps up two-day visit to affected areas; pledges no discrimination in assistance.


Z Ali/abdul Manan September 18, 2011

LAHORE/HYDERABAD:


Even as the United Nations launched a global appeal for $357 million to help flood victims in Sindh and Balochistan, international donors have made it clear to the government that they will not donate a penny to Islamabad unless they receive a clear blueprint for third party audits of where their money is being spent.

This revelation was made by Punjab Governor Abdul Latif Khosa during a press conference at the governor house in Lahore on Sunday.

“They [donors] want a transparent mechanism in which all damages and losses should be evaluated by a reputable third party,” Governor Khosa told reporters.

The $357 million appeal is only to garner initial “life saving assistance to the most affected people” said the UN’s humanitarian coordinator in Pakistan, Timo Pakkala.

(Read: Govt has provided reasonably well, but ability to respond not enough, says UN coordinator)

The reluctance – which borders on outright refusal – to help Pakistan overcome its second devastating floods in successive years is seen as an indicator of a serious lack of global credibility for the administration of President Asif Ali Zardari.

When asked to explain the international community’s skittishness, the governor evaded the question, saying only that “foreign aid should not be made controversial.”

Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani had launched an international appeal for funds which was met with a paltry $4.7 million pledge of donations from China, though Iran has promised another $100 million in aid, the only foreign government so far to come forth with any significant assistance to Pakistan’s flood victims.

While the appeals continue to be made on a daily basis, the government appears to have all but given up on the idea that any foreign government would be willing to help Pakistan. Governor Khosa, returning from a whirlwind tour of the flood-affected areas of Sindh, appeared morose and downtrodden when he said that it was up to the people of Pakistan themselves to help those in need.

The governor announced that the Punjab government would be holding a concert in Lahore, where Rahat Fateh Ali Khan would perform. Tickets would be sold for Rs10,000 a piece. He expected to raise up to Rs100 million from that initiative.

PM’s visit

Meanwhile, Gilani rounded up his two-day visit to the six calamity-hit districts of Sindh with pledges of help for relief for the flood victims and their subsequent rehabilitation. He started off his visit from Nawabshah, Sanghar and Hyderabad on the first day and visited Tharparker, Umerkot and Mirpurkhas districts on Sunday. Besides observing an aerial view of the submerged areas, the PM also met people in the relief camps.

“Each affected family will be given a Rs20,000 grant through Pakistan Cards, and they will also get stipends from Pakistan Baitulmal and Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP),” Gilani said while visiting relief camps in Naukot and Tharparker.

Gilani said that he has directed the army to use helicopters to provide relief, food and health services to people in the marooned areas.

The premier made appeals to independent donors, friendly countries and non-government organisations to take part in the relief and rehabilitation efforts and requested all political parties to come forward and help the affected people.

No discrimination

A significant proportion of the population in Thar and Umerkot districts comprises minority communities, especially Hindus. These marginalised people, according to some reports, were being discriminated against in the distribution of relief goods. Citing such reports, the prime minister directed the officers to monitor and ensure a no-discrimination policy.

“All people are equal before the government and Hindus are our brothers. The government will extend them all facilities given to other affected people,” he assured.

Agriculture

The torrential monsoon rains and the ensuing flooding in canals and saline water drains have destroyed around 1.7 million acres of agricultural land, according to government estimates. But the farmers’ representative organisation puts the losses far beyond the government’s calculation.

Gilani met a delegation of the Sindh Chamber of Agriculture, led by its president Dr Syed Nadeem Qamar, at the Circuit House Hyderabad, and turned down the farmer’s demand to waive loans for land holders cultivating around 50 acres.

“The prime minister said they can’t waive the loans because the growers who suffered from floods last year didn’t either get a write-off either,” Nabi Bux Sathio, who was representing farmers during the meeting, told The Express Tribune.

Estimates

According to the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) some six million people in all 23 districts of Sindh have now been affected by the floods with another 824,000 displaced.

Thousands of people are stranded on hillocks and roofs, with the government unable to meet more than 30 per cent of funds needed for emergency rescue and relief efforts, it said in a joint news conference with the UN.

(Read: Thousands trapped in flood-hit Sindh)

The UN said its assessment showed that nearly every district in Sindh had seen flooding, as well as five districts of Balochistan, killing 342 people and injuring 633 others so far.

(With additional input from AFP)

Published in The Express Tribune, September 19th,  2011.

COMMENTS (37)

rehmat | 12 years ago | Reply

"The governor announced that the Punjab government would be holding a concert in Lahore, where Rahat Fateh Ali Khan would perform. Tickets would be sold for Rs10,000 a piece. He expected to raise up to Rs100 million from that initiative"

If each ticket is worth 10,000 rupees and 100 million are to be raised then 10,000 people need to attend that concert. Does Lahore have 10,000 people who are able to afford a 10,000 rupees ticket and also is Punjab government able to provide security to such a large concert? I know that lately large concerts are no longer held due to bomb blast threats.

Reza | 12 years ago | Reply

Being a Humanitarian worker I would simply advocate the stance of Donor Agencies for submitting the documents by the government to justify each penny spent on the welfare of the community. I being the International Community worker myself knows that much of the donation is consumed by international organizations on their personal amenities and luxuries.

A part from this when the amount reaches the grass root level it doesn't/cannot make a real difference.

In the light of above facts Pakistan's image would be tranished.

As far as the Sindh disaster is concerned I would rather term it as a Man made disaster instead of a Natural Disaster. The reason behind my statement takes me back to the reality that Sindh is mostly a land dominated by Feudal Lords. The disaster was mainly caused by the breaches in embankments made on LBOD. Now LBOD is Asia's biggest drainnage which in itself has a fault structure. When it started flowing 10 times above its capacity why did it actually flooded the areas?

Refer back to my statement of Sindh's Feudalism. Feudal lords have carved out several small/big canals in order to provide water to their crops. As soon as the drainage was filled with excessive rain waters, the same canals coming from LBOD started breaching embankments and caused inundation.

We people need to realize and choose our responses now ownwards. This country is ruled by those that are pursuing self interests. In this country nobody talks about a prosperous nation rather propering politicians. Thats all i have to say. Unfortunately according to one report Pakistan has only 200 disaster experts in the country of 180 million population that themselves are trained to deal with climates such as hurricane, earthquake and war disasters. None are there to deal with flood disasters.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ