Sinner's doping deal sets precedent: Medvedev

Tennis players react to the handling of high profile case by WADA


Reuters/AFP February 17, 2025
Jannik Sinner during his singles group stage match against Russia’s Daniil Medvedev during the ATP Finals in Inalpi Arena, Turin on November 14, 2024. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE

print-news
BENGALURU/DUBAI:

Former world number one Daniil Medvedev said he hopes other players can also reach settlements with the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) after Australian Open champion Jannik Sinner accepted an immediate three-month doping ban on Saturday. Sinner reached a settlement with WADA, who had appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) against an independent tribunal's decision to clear the Italian of wrongdoing after the three-times Grand Slam winner failed drug tests.

Rather than face the prospect of a lengthy ban, with a decision expected by the end of the year, Sinner accepted the three-month suspension which will allow him to return before the French Open.

WADA withdrew its appeal after the settlement.

"I hope that the next few times, the players will be able to do that. WADA will say, 'We've found that (anti-doping rule violation), you get two years.' And you say, 'Well, no, I want one month'," Medvedev told reporters.

"So I hope that it will create a precedent where everyone will have the opportunity to defend themselves better than before. Otherwise, if it's not going to be possible, it's going to be bizarre."

Medvedev said Sinner was probably able to reach a settlement as he had a good team of lawyers, a luxury most players on the tour do not have.

"I hope that everyone will have the right to represent themselves because sometimes players don't have the money for a lawyer, they do it themselves," Medvedev added.

"It's a bad sign if he's the only one who can do that, but it's a very good sign if, after that, everyone will be able to do it."

The settlement was criticised by current and former players, with Australian Nick Kyrgios saying it was a "sad day for tennis".

The Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA), an organisation established by Novak Djokovic, said the "bias is unacceptable" after many other players received longer bans.

The PTPA said last month it was launching a new pro-bono legal defence programme for players facing allegations of doping or corruption.

Tennis anti-doping process completely broken: Pegula

World number five Jessica Pegula believes the handling of high-profile doping cases involving Jannick Sinner and Iga Swiatek has shown that the "process is completely broken".

And top-ranked Aryna Sabalenka admits she cannot trust the tennis anti-doping system and has become "too scared" of it.

Similarly, Swiatek accepted a one-month ban after testing positive for the banned heart drug trimetazidine (TMZ) late last year.

The 23-year-old Pole had pulled out of the WTA's Asian swing in September-October citing "personal matters".

Pegula, last year's US Open finalist and a member of the WTA Players' Council, said the inconsistencies in the way cases are being processed and judged is creating an unfair environment for all tennis players.

Sour taste

Former British number one Tim Henman said the settlement left a "sour taste for the sport".

"I don't think in any way he has been trying to cheat at any stage," Henman told Sky Sports. "However, when I read this statement... it just seems a little bit too convenient. It seems that there's words like 'agreement', and it almost seems like there's been a negotiation.

"I think when you're dealing with drugs in sport, it very much has to be black and white. It's binary, it's positive or negative - you're banned or you're not banned."

Britain's former number one-ranked doubles player Tara Moore, who was cleared of an anti-doping rule violation 19 months after she was suspended, said on X: "Can someone explain how a negotiation was possible?"

Moore had spent $250,000 in legal fees and said she expects her expenses will climb as the International Tennis Integrity Agency told her it would appeal an independent tribunal finding of no fault or negligence.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ