Karachi traders suggest Maryam Nawaz take over as Sindh chief minister

The proposal was met with resounding support from all traders present, who backed idea of Maryam heading Sindh’s govt


News Desk January 26, 2025

Listen to article

In an unusual appeal, Karachi’s business community has called for Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader Maryam Nawaz to serve as Sindh’s chief minister, citing her performance in Punjab, Express News reported.

During a meeting with Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal on Sunday, a senior trader remarked, "Give us Maryam Nawaz Sharif for a while, and you can take Murad Ali Shah."

The proposal was met with resounding support from all traders present, who backed the idea of Maryam heading Sindh’s government. Iqbal was seen smiling at the suggestion but refrained from commenting.

The remarks underscore growing dissatisfaction among Karachi’s business community with the provincial government’s performance. Shah, the current chief minister of Sindh and a Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) member, has faced criticism over governance issues in the province, particularly in Karachi.

Maryam, who has primarily played a role in federal and party politics, has gained recognition for her leadership, with traders attributing progress in Punjab to her efforts. However, calls for her appointment as Sindh's chief minister remain symbolic and politically charged.

COMMENTS (2)

Abdul Sallam Kalhoro | 4 months ago | Reply That is why need the karachi traders demand for change CM that is right time to indicate and Demand To Lead Mariyam Nawaz as cm of Sindh Murad Ali Shah has no ability he failed since last 8 years to bring peace and security in the city and in province Murad shah is pro political servant of Pppp and Mariyam is pre public servant of Punjab no compare with her in the country and time to resign now of CM sindh.
Abid | 4 months ago | Reply Trader should respect the mandate of people of sindh and pay taxes according
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ