Minister denies doling out Rs500b to MNAs

Tarar urges former colleagues to stop spreading ‘false’ claims


Our Correspondent July 02, 2024
Information Minister Attaullah Tarar. PHOTO: FILE

print-news
ISLAMABAD:

Information Minister Attaullah Tarar on Monday rebutted the “false claims” of his former party colleagues about doling out Rs500 billion funds to the members of the National Assembly (MNAs) in the federal budget 2024-25.

“Neither have we allocated Rs500 billion nor has any intention in this regard. This is a wrong notion and sheer exaggeration,” he added.

The minister clarified that an amount of Rs1,500 billion was earmarked for the development schemes in the budget. “It is the right of every person to form a political party but nobody is allowed to spread misinformation and disinformation,” he remarked. To a query about inflated electricity bills, he said the energy minister would address a news conference and brief the masses on the issue in detail.

The proposal for privatization of the electricity distribution companies was under consideration and new boards would be formed to make them profitable organizations, he said in response to another query.

He said the government had reduced petroleum prices upto Rs 35, but the international market had its own impact.

To another query, he said tax exemption was only given to the martyrs’ families and retired civil officers who served the country for their whole life.

To another query, he said the government’s austerity campaign was in full swing.

Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) Quaid Nawaz Sharif and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had always been magnanimous to Shahid Khaqan Abbassi and Miftah Ismail and dealt them with respect and dignity, he concluded.

The minister said he expected of his former colleagues Shahid Khaqan Abbasi and Miftah Ismail to appreciate the decisions and initiatives taken by the government to reduce expenditures and inflation.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ