Social media regulations
Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah has recently indicated plans to introduce regulations to ‘control’ some social media elements that harm people’s privacy. This will not be the first time a Pakistani government has tried to regulate social media activity. Pakistan has had a long history of internet and social media blocks with app bans lasting for years — something that has reflected poorly on the country’s ability to allow freedom of speech. The government’s decision to introduce a new bill comes after a surge in misinformation and rumours against state institutions, organisations and individuals during the last few months. Earlier, the federal government approved an amendment to the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) Act empowering it with a section of the Pakistan Penal Code to act against anyone who intends to spread rumours or false information against state institutions on social media.
The government reassured that it would consult organisations representing media-persons about FIA’s social media laws and will withdraw the bill if it restricts freedom of expression. Given the fast-paced nature of social media, it is almost impossible to control the dissemination of information without a severe crackdown. These laws blur lines between different forms of content significantly curbing users’ activity and alienating the public. The new amendment will allow the FIA to take unilateral action without needing a court permit or warrant, which may set a dangerous precedent.
Instead of simply consulting media bodies and other stakeholders, the federal government should include them in the decision-making process to adopt a targeted strategy to root out adverse elements from social media. It is worth mentioning that tightening social media laws and regulations can only limit the flow of information on online platforms allowing wayward elements to continue spreading disinformation through other means. This can raise alarm amongst the public compelling people to act against any individual or community.
Therefore, the federal government must initiate wider discourse on the need to double-check information and the harmful consequences of disseminating incorrect information. Although laws can help control public activity online, the onus lies on the government, the opposition and other stakeholders to remain cautious of their rhetoric on public forums to prevent mischief-makers from propagating false narratives in pursuit of their vested interest and nefarious designs.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 4th, 2022.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.