LAHORE/ISLAMABAD:
The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on Wednesday conducted raids at the residences of a number of sugar dealers in many cities of Punjab in connection with its probe into a steep hike in the price of the commodity last year and nabbed a gang allegedly part of a powerful sugar mafia.
According to sources in the FIA, the gang helped in creating a shortage of the commodity through hoarding – a fake scarcity that resulted in the increase of the mill price of sugar from Rs70 to Rs90 in just one year.
The mafia also allegedly minted Rs110billion through illegally speculation and used hundreds of fake bank accounts to transfer the ill-gotten money. The sources claimed that the gang was apparently backed by large sugar mills owned by political personalities.
The FIA conducted these raids in Lahore, Multan, Sargodha, Chishtian, Hasilpur, Mailsi and Faisalabad. During these raids, the FIA officials interrogated the sugar dealers for three to four hours.
Read more: PM Imran orders indiscriminate action against sugar hoarders
They also took into custody their and their family members’ mobile phones. The officials also extracted data from the laptops, close circuit television (CCTV) cameras and digital-video-recorder (DVR) records of these dealers.
The sources said the FIA has collected solid evidence from 32 mobile phones and laptops. The agency has now decided to probe into the bank accounts of these dealers, register FIRs and makes arrests.
They said the FIA Lahore has constituted 20 teams for uprooting the mafia by taking action under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. The crackdown will be supervised by the FIA Lahore director.
Prime Minister Imran Khan on March 11 expressed extreme displeasure over the Federal Board of Revenue’s (FBR) failure to take action against the sugar mills owned by political personalities and ordered the taxman to launch an indiscriminate crackdown in the light of an inquiry commission report.
The FBR had presented to the prime minister a report about recovery of taxes from the sugar mills which according to a sugar inquiry commission had minted billions of rupees through illegal means.
The sugar inquiry commission – headed by the FIA chief – was formed to probe into a sudden shortage of sugar that resulted in a steep hike in its prices in January 2020.
In its preliminary report – unveiled on April 5 – the commission had claimed that sugar mills belonging to the families of the country’s top politicians including PML-N’s Shehbaz Sharif, PTI’s Jahangir Tareen and Khusro Bakhtiar, PML-Q’s Moonis Elahi and PPP’s Asif Ali Zardari were among beneficiaries of the crisis.
In its forensic report – issued on May 21 – the commission had accused the sugar mill owners of earning illegal profits to the tune of billions of rupees through unjustified price hikes, benami transactions, tax evasion, misuse of subsidy and purchasing sugarcane off the books.
The FBR report stated that the tax authority recovered Rs404 billion from the sugar mills on account of taxes. These taxes were evaded from 2015 to 2019. However, the report did not contain any detail about the actions the FBR took against the sugar mills owned by political personalities.
According to the report, the FBR had not yet completed its investigation with regard to the sugar mills of PTI’s Jahangir Tahreen, Khusro Bakhtiar, Humayun Akhtar and PML-N’s Shehbaz Sharif and their families.
These mills include Al-Arabia, Alliance, Chanar, Etihad, Gulf, Hunza, Jauharabad, JDW, JK, Macca, Ramzan, RYK, Shahtaj, Shakarganj, Sheikhoo, Tandlianwala, Two Stars Limited, Chasma, Khazana and Premier sugar mills.
Sources in the PM office had said Imran Khan expressed displeasure over the report and asked the FBR as to why it did not take indiscriminate action against all culprits.
The premier had later ordered the tax authority to submit a report after carrying out indiscriminate action on the basis of the inquiry commission’s findings.
WITH ADDITIONAL INPUT FROM NEWS DESK
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ