Peshawar attack: Over a dozen Nato tankers destroyed

The incident took place when an oil tanker, parked inside a container terminal, exploded.

Express August 07, 2011


More than a dozen Nato tankers caught fire following a blast in a container terminal in the Ring Road area late on Saturday, police said.

The blast took place inside an oil tanker at around 9pm, parked inside the container terminal located in the southern outskirts of the city.

A police source informed The Express Tribune that the blast took place in the Fauji Logistics, where at least 55 tankers were parked when the fire broke out.

The source added that around 30 of these tankers had caught fire and only 15 could be taken to a safer place.

SSP Operations Ijaz Ahmed however, while talking to reporters, put the number of vehicles at 13, including 11 containers and two oil tankers. No casualties were reported in the incident.

The source quoting tanker drivers said a tanker had arrived a day earlier in the yard following which its chassis was taken out and the vehicle exploded.

He added that the 15 vehicles taken to the safer side however could not be taken out of the area since the raging fire prevented the rescue teams from doing so.

He also said it was very difficult for the rescue teams to contain the flames, since fire was spreading from one tanker to another. He said most drivers and cleaners also fled away from the scene following the incident.

Fire-fighting efforts were still being carried out till the filing of this report.

Ring Road has witnessed the worst attacks on Nato supplies in 2008 and early 2009, when militants destroyed hundreds of Nato tankers, Humvee armoured carriers and other vehicles in several raids. Following these attacks most of the terminals were forced out of the city.

Last month, police in Nowshera district had detained tanker drivers on charges of sabotaging the vehicles.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 7th, 2011.


Peshawar | 10 years ago | Reply

nato tankers destroyed, why dont terrorist take oil out of it and then put fire on that, at least somebody will take benefit of it, other wise it is just destroyed.

Nato should pay addtional amount to army to protect their tankers. :p

Zia | 10 years ago | Reply

The US has transactional objectives in all relationships. Currently don't want to pay the $800m for services already provided since June2010. Secondly they have turned down additional payment levies for road & infrastructure damage by the NATO transport operation.

Their own credit rating has been downgraded one notch by S&P, just Friday. And they won't pay past due bills. Their plan for drawing down from Afghanistan, is so that they can wash their hands off, and leave Pakistan & Afgs to deal with Talibans on-ground, while they play wider drone games, with little skin in the game.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read