That being settled, it has to be said that the point of the piece in question was lost on these persons. The point I was making was that no silk ever came from China to India by the road through Hunza and Gilgit. The fact is that when the Karakoram Highway was first opened back in the late 1970s, it was indeed billed as the Silk Road. No surprise then that we have a ‘Silk Road’ hotel in Gulmit (plus a couple more elsewhere along the road) and we have a bus service of the same name that does not cross the border into China.
If one were to find Pakistan Tourism Development Corporation brochures from those early days, one would see how the road was being marketed. That the road was a marvel of engineering, dedication and hard work was but a footnote. The information that the building of this fabulous connection, through very difficult terrain under extreme weather conditions — a feat that had cost many lives, both Chinese and Pakistani — was tucked away somewhere instead of being highlighted. The brochures harped on the non-existent silk trade of the road.
For good measure, they even dragged in old Marco Polo. No surprise then that the manager of Marco Polo Inn (again in Gulmit) shared a nugget with me in 1997: Mr Polo was an Englishman who had visited Gulmit in 1860 or thereabouts. While sojourning here, he invented the game of (what else) polo!
In China, the Silk Road trifurcated at Anxi (120 km northeast of Dunhuang). The northern branch passed through Turfan and Kulja (Yining on modern maps) to Khojand (Tajikistan). From Anxi, the other branch made Dunhuang where it further bifurcated. Of these, the central went west to Aqsu (Aksu) en route to Kashgar. The southern route swung southwest from Dunhuang and also made Kashgar by way of Khotan, Karghalik and Yarkand.
Meeting again at Kashgar the two roads then proceeded to unite with the northern branch of the Silk Road at Khojand. Thence onward to the fabled cities of Samarqand and Balkh, Seleucia and Byzantium. And, oh, what a journey it must have been! Nowhere along this great expanse did a branch take off to bring silk, I repeat, to bring silk into the subcontinent by way of Hunza and Gilgit.
There is no denying that one minor road connected Hunza with Kashgar. Until very recent times, in fact, until as recently as 1947, Hunza did look northward to Chinese Turkestan as its closest cultural partner. The road north from Hunza did not go by way of the Khunjerab Pass, however. It went by the pretty little village of Misgar (which has the oldest post office in the entire Gilgit-Baltistan region dating to the 1890s) through the breathtaking beauty of pastures with poetic names like Ronhil, Potehil and Yaram Goz, up over the 4,684 metre-high Mintaka Pass on its way to Tashkurghan.
Even if the road passed through scenery that is beautiful enough to cause heartache, it was not a conduit for silk. Dr Harald Hauptmann, the current master of the rock art in this region, recently confirmed to a friend of mine that there is no evidence whatsoever of silk ever being traded this way.
The silk in India mostly came through China’s Yunnan province of China and through Myanmar. But in 1925, a young hill walker freewheeling around the Karakoram Pass connecting Khotan with Leh and Srinagar saw a large quantity of bolts of silk stored in an inn. Though the Leh-Khotan-Yarkand route was a very busy trade route, this was the first evidence of silk passing this way. Perhaps silk being a common commodity coming this way, earlier local travellers never considered it noteworthy enough to comment on it.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 9th, 2011.
COMMENTS (20)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Wow! Such exquisite hair splitting when Pakistan and India have 100s of millions starving. Our elite really knows how to keep the cake and eat it too. I wonder, when will they wake up. When Pakistanis cannot awake themselves with the threat of the Taliban and the Indians don't even wince about the Maoists ... and go crazy about the Silk Road / Route legacy ... you have to wonder, if these elites have any 'lites' in their head. Phew!
Salman Rashid
Please do continue your work. Ignore the dissenters.
Dear Sir,
I beg of you. Please don't write anything that goes against the popular narrative. It only brings you hate mails and so many comments here with self-righteous indignation.
For a change, why don't you write something which the readers can lap it up gleefully? (This is known as Zakir Naik technique; tell people what they want to hear.)
Why can't you write on how the Invasion of Sindh brought prosperity to the region? You can also write that Mohd of Ghaznavi went to Somnath to help the untouchables there, and it was at their invitation, he went and plundered the evil temple. This will be nice to read.
You can also write about how Ibn Batutta praised the rule of Delhi Sultans; you can also bust the myths explaining how this Mohenjodoro and Harappan finds are over-rated and possibly no civilization ever existed there.
But one article I would love to read is on how Urdu is the oldest language of India and how our Moghul emperors encouraged the growth of the language meant only for us, Muslims. An article along these lines would make people shower you, sir, with a lot of love, I can assure you.
-----Respectable All,
what the author wants to prove not known to him. Just argument for the sake of argument. Aimless debate and wastage of time. Such writers are time based and self interest orientation. This man himself narrated that, at that time it was used as slogan while that was not correct. This clear shows that, he knows both the situation well and had a role in both the point of time.
I do agree with DEE Jay, for the author Hunza or Gilgit-Baltistan he has limitted area otherwise for such a personality who claim expertise never give such comments that are not any sound basis. The business relation and cross boarder blood relationship is still exist and cross boarder marriage are in the customs of the Wakhi Toojik Community. Few of the places in China, like DUFDAR, TASHGURGAN, VECHA, YARGHAND, ETC. UD THE WRITTER TO SHARE HIS THOUGHT ON THE NAME OF KHARAKURUM, FROM WHICH LANGUAGE OF PAKISTAN THE WORD HAS BEEN EXTRACTED AND WHAT IT MEAN???????
sir i didn;t get your purpose of writing this article. which part of your life compeled you to write about the Silk Road or Silk Route trade fully concentrated over silk only. Being a resident of the area i know about the History or have got much awareness about its trade to cultural diversity. You know about silk road when the part of the countary was included with Pakistan , seems you donot have awareness about the pre independent life style over the area.If you have bothered to meet the residents of the area they didn't know what and where Pakistan is..? They were very close to china and their whole trade and culture was somehow part of china. Marco Polo and few Internationl and historical tourists used this route to enter china .they didnt use the Yunnan or Mayyanmar..
@Ashok: The term "silk road" was coined by a German geographer Ferdinand Freiherr von Richthofen the purported uncle of the famed "Red Baron". Mr. Rushdie is right, the silk road is a myth. Europeans have always renamed or reinvented what they couldn't understand. Its a Greek legacy. The "Middle East" is a good one. Geopolitics at its worst. Every land and people infected by colonial-imperialism got a name change. The world is still trying to sort this mess out. It is really getting bizarre with technology as the newest toy. Gone are the days when social 'science' spearheaded by anthropology used craniology as a psychological weapon. Photoshop is more fun...
The term "silk road" was coined by a German geographer Ferdinand Freiherr von Richthofen the purported uncle of the famed "Red Baron". Mr. Rushdie is right, the silk road is a myth. Europeans have always renamed or reinvented what they couldn't understand. Its a Greek legacy. The "Middle East" is a good one. Geopolitics at its worst. Every land and people infected by colonial-imperialism got a name change. The world is still trying to sort this mess out. It is really getting bizarre with technology as the newest toy. Gone are the days when social 'science' spearheaded by anthropology used craniology as a psychological weapon. Photoshop is more fun...
@Dee Jay
Do you have to be disrespectful to the people you don't aggree with? We can aggree to disaggree. I refer to the last line of your post.
Seems like an indian dirty infiltration on this page. Better back off and mind your own business. First of all try to find out and solve the mystery of ur own personal existence, then raise questions against others. About the article.......good way to past time. I better write an article on alexander by passing the regions in Pakistan into present india. Haha.....
The author has inspired me to write an article called "The Myth of the Myth of the Silk Road'.
It has already been pointed out to the author that the name 'Silk Road' is a misnomer, and for two reasons. Firstly, there never existed a single 'Silk Road'. There were in fact many Silk routes, so to speak, crossing Eurasia. These routes were general trade routes that transported many commodities from Europe to China, and all the places in between. Secondly, silk was only one commodity out of many transported along the Silk routes. It just so happens that Silk was the commodity most sought after by Europeans and hence the name they used for it.
His whole article was predicated on misinformation and hence it is simply perverse for him to persist in this manner.
There is another fact to the road being named Silk Rout which is not only its past but present and future as well. No matter if there was silk coming through this route to India or not but it is fact that after construction Silk started to come through this road to the entire Arab, Gulf and other connected countries. Silk will keep comming through this route for generations to come- if not to India, but to the entire world... so what is the need of taking this matter too serious. In past silk would come through this route to the neighboring autonomous states stretched from the China border into Afghanistan…It makes less sense to me that silk did not go to India that time therefor it is wrong to call it Silk Rout. India was the only country around.
I find Pakistani interest in this peace of history bit puzzling. As such they are in denial of 3,000 years of their history, and here instead take some curious interest to become part of this man made silk route. Indians can be excused, as they always claimed history belonging to them, and want to deny Pakistan, who are in any case in denial mode, this silk route.
Its always intersting to see how our Indian neighbours dont miss an opportunity to hit on Paksitan in their comments .
From the article: "...But in 1925, a young hill walker freewheeling around the Karakoram Pass connecting Khotan with Leh and Srinagar saw a large quantity of bolts of silk stored in an inn." I think i can clear up the mystery of this one. In the 1920s up to WW2 there was a flourishing trade by muleteers, mainly Punjabis from Hoshiarpur area. When i was a kid i was friends with a guy whose family had plied mules between India and Central Asia. In fact the first time i ever heard of these places was from his father: Yarkand, Kashgar, Khotan and Tashkand (Tashkent?). They had a branch office in Yarkand, if i remember correctly. The route was through the Kulu valley, Lahaul valley, then Leh and onwards. They went with red chillies, gur, machine-made goods etc and came back with silk, salt and some other stuff which i don't remember.
Mr. Salman hope I need answer to another very important question... there have never been Pak people lived in Pakistan than why do we call this country Pakistan or why was teh country named Pakistan....?
In a discovery programme, It was clearly mentioned that silk route was passing through Yunan to Myanmar.But there was no mention of India,neither Pak or any other country except china.At that time both Pakistan and Burma(today's myanmar ) were part of United India. So,it is unnecessary to discuss all those things.
To Mr.Writer,
History is always history.We learn history to take some inspiration from it.Buw what kind of inspiration do we find from this silk route article? May be chinese people have something to get ?Again at that time silk was precious because silk was found in china at that time.now we have silk all around the world.Better try to make our present in order, in stead of discussing history which is irrelevant to us.How many people in Pak know about Gandhar civilization ?Try to appreciate all those things what we have got.
The articles shouldn't really be a place to vent out against the hate materials received. It is better to just ignore the hate and continue writing about what you believe or want to convey. I enjoy reading such articles as they give you a different point of view to look at things and maybe even explore further on your own .
I would suggest the author to inform his readers about the purpose of the Karokaram highway - why it was built and in what geopolitical context it needed to happen in the minds of the rulers of Pakistan (the purpose seems to be intended to provide Pakistan with a supply Chinese soldiers in case of a war with India post the 1971 loss of Purbo Bongo). I may even speculate that the writer served in the Pakistan military during this time, since I have read elsewhere that he is a retired serviceman of the Pakistan military. I don't want to get the author in trouble, but since he seems to demonstrate a clear and logical mind with a genuine appreciation of history and how it develops, I will venture to say that he is dissatisfied with the ideology of Pakistan, since he somewhere along the way realized that it intellectually altered his countrymen into believing in something artificial, unnatural and imposed from outside on the present day people of Pakistan. I would categorize another Tribune contributer, Mr. Saroop Ijaz in this category as well. However, openly saying that you are against the ideology of Pakistan can actually get you imprisoned in Pakistan as I learned from watching a Berkeley television program featuring another Tribune writer, Mr. Khalid Ahmed. I can appreciate the circumstances Mr. Salman Rashid writes under, having been a frequent reader of his on another newspaper before I started to read his columns here. The author being a historian should not shy away from the less romantic sides of history and should start giving his opinion on the early development of modern day Pakistan taking into consideration primarily military moves, motives and decisions that were consequential in its modern day domestic and foreign policies.
Hey 'Dee Jay' - please learn to be a little more respectful. I initially found your comment to seem like informed writing, almost a complement to what the author was trying to convey, but your last sentence lowered the value I place on your comment.
I didn't got chance to read the 1st part of Mr. Salman's Article but here, after reading the 2nd part I would say it is useless, time consuming and far away from reality. he never got a chance to stay and discuss the real history with the elders of Hunza especially of Gojal area. At 1st he merged the Central Hunza with upper part known as Gojal ignoring the fact of Linguistic and geographical differences at 2nd step he forgot that Gojal area is a part of Pamir region including parts of Afghanistan, China, and Tajiskistan. When you go to China you will find people speaking Wakhi language and following the same tradition of culture and religion which the locals of Gojal do. It was normal for the people of upper of Hunza to visit China because in the old time there was rare connection between the people of Central Hunza and Gojal so it was easy for the local of Gojal to reach Xijiang province. Now a days still there is border trade between the locals of Chipursan Gojal and people of Wakhan Afghanistan without any restriction or visa process. Still they are relying on barter system because of huge differences in currency value. The same was in older time with Chinese people from the border area, through Misgar valley they used to bring commodities and even getting married was normal. Still the people of Gojal find their roots in China especially in Kashkhar area. when you read the last edition of "Where Three Empires Meet" of E.F.Knight there he also discussed the trade activities of these areas. Don't try to justify your wisdom when it is based on s*