US-China trade officials to talk again 'this week': official

Trade talks collapsed in May, American side accused Beijing of reneging on key commitments


Afp July 16, 2019
PHOTO: FILE

WASHINGTON DC: Top United States (US) and Chinese trade negotiators are due to speak by telephone in the coming days, but no face-to-face talks have been scheduled yet, US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said on Monday.

That would be the second call in two weeks by senior officials from Washington and Beijing as the thaw in fraught trade negotiations continues.

"We expect to have another principal-level call this week," Mnuchin told reporters on Monday.

"To the extent we make significant progress, there's a good chance we'll go there later."

President Donald Trump and his Chinese counterpart last month agreed to resume trade talks after discussions collapsed in early May when the American side accused Beijing of reneging on key commitments.

Trump urges China to remove tariffs on US agricultural products

As a result, Trump jacked up duty rates on $200 billion in Chinese imports but agreed last month not to move forward with another $300 billion in import duties.

He said on Monday the tariffs are starting to bite on the Chinese economy, which saw its economic growth hit the slowest pace in 27 years.

"This is why China wants to make a deal....with the US and wishes it had not broken the original deal in the first place," Trump tweeted.

He continues to insist incorrectly that tariffs are paid by China rather than by US companies and consumers, and again accused Beijing of devaluing its currency to make its products cheaper even with the tariffs.

Washington and Beijing have hit each other with punitive tariffs covering more than $360 billion in two-way trade.

Mnuchin and US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer had a phone conversation last week with China's Vice Premier Liu He and Commerce Minister Zhong Shan.

 

 

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ