FO rejects Indian media’s attempt to link Easter attacks with Pakistan

Seven Pakistanis detained in Sri Lanka on account of overstay, clarifies spokesperson

News Desk April 24, 2019
Seven Pakistanis detained in Sri Lanka on account of overstay, clarifies spokesperson. PHOTO: FILE

Pakistan has reacted strongly to irresponsible comments in a section of Indian media about detention of some Pakistanis in Sri Lanka, calling it an attempt to malign the country.

Some Indian media outlets had tried to link the detention with the Easter Sunday suicide bomb attacks on churches and luxury hotels that killed 359 people in Sri Lanka. At least 500 people were injured in the April 21 attacks.

According to the information shared by Sri Lankan officials, seven Pakistanis were recently detained by the law enforcement authorities on account of overstay on their visas. “This is a purely consular matter and projecting it in any other manner is patently mischievous,” Foreign Office Spokesperson Dr Muhammad Faisal said in a statement on Wednesday.

PM Imran condoles with Lanka premier after Easter carnage

Such attempts by elements in the Indian media were reflective of a particular, though familiar, mindset bent on twisting facts to malign Pakistan on any pretext, he added.

The spokesperson also drew attention to the call of the Sri Lankan leadership to avoid propagating unverified reports and speculation in this connection.

The deadly blasts have been claimed by the Islamic State group, with Sri Lanka’s government pointing the finger at the little-known local group National Thowheeth Jama’ath, but saying the group likely had ‘international’ help.

Nearly 60 people have been detained since the Sunday blasts, which ripped through high-end hotels and churches packed with Easter worshippers in the capital Colombo and beyond.

It is the worst violence in the country since the end of a Tamil insurgency a decade ago.

Our Publications


Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ