In a separate but related matter, the Peshawar High Court seeks records of 90 petitions filed on behalf of persons accused of militancy and convicted by military courts. Many of the accused are set to be executed having already been granted extensions once. While the Peshawar High Court waits on these records to be relinquished by military courts, families must eagerly be waiting to hear what definition of terrorism the Supreme Court bench produces as this may impact the petition seekers. Already, one man accused of facilitating two Peshawar bombings was granted bail, which may not be agreeable to some.
A solid definition of terrorism examining the history of terrorist attacks, political motivations, factors that are directly and indirectly involved, as well as the outcomes needs to be published. There was a period after the Peshawar APS attack and NAP in which raids were conducted across cities and punishments meted out without much legal recourse for the arrested or accused. This was also not the way of a fair democratic state and so it is hoped that a revision of terrorism will take into consideration a more sensible approach prior to accusing suspects. Conversely, however, the families of innocent civilians who have been murdered in attacks will be eager to know whether those implicated will be allowed to walk freely.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 21st, 2019.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ