Ball in BCCI’s court, Sethi on Pakistan-India bilateral series

PCB chairman says fans want to see arch-rivals play cricket against each other


Sports Desk April 24, 2018
PHOTO: AFP

Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chairman Najam Sethi believes the ball is in the court of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) for the resumption of cricketing ties between the arch-rivals.

India and Pakistan have not played a bilateral series since 2012-13, even though both teams were scheduled to play eight series from 2015-2023 under the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), which was signed at the time of the formation of the Big Three.

However, not even a single series has materialised after Indian government refused to give a green signal to the board to play against Pakistan.

'Not India, not Pakistan, cricket should win'


As a result, the PCB lodged a $70 million claim of damages with the International Cricket Council (ICC) against BCCI for not honouring the MoU.

The ICC formed a three-member panel to settle the dispute, which will decide the case in October this year.

Sethi, who is currently in India for ICC’s Annual General Meeting, was quoted by the Press Trust of Indi as saying: "India and Pakistan need to play each other for the sake of the people of the sub-continent, but the ball is in BCCI's court. We hope sooner rather than later sense will prevail and the two sides can get back to playing good cricket again.”

He continued by saying he can’t reveal the proceedings of the ICC’s dispute resolution tribunal. "I'm not at liberty to discuss the issue as per the orders of the tribunal.”

Sethi, who was a full-time journalist before becoming the head of the PCB, also showed his surprise on the unassertive role of Indian media regarding cricketing ties between both countries.

ICC forms panel to resolve Pakistan-India dispute


“I'm just surprised that there's not sufficient media pressure here in India for resumption of cricketing ties with Pakistan,” he said. “I am sure the fans want to see cricket between the two countries. There's a lot of goodwill on both sides so let's hope that the issue can be resolved in the interest of the fans. There's no rough weather between the two Boards. There's no problem at all.”

Talking about resumption of cricket in Pakistan, Sethi believes a lot more has to be done. "It's unfortunate that given a situation — a hangover from the past (2009 terrorist attack) we are still unable to play all our matches,” he said. “The Pakistan Super League (PSL) is very popular at home. It receives the highest possible ratings ever in the history of Pakistan TV and broadcast medium. Our effort is to bring PSL back to Pakistan so that we can play all our matches at home, but we are taking small steps as we are hoping that bilateral cricket will also come back to Pakistan. Another important step in this direction is that the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) has just agreed that the Emerging Asia Cup will be played partly in Pakistan and partly in Sri Lanka. We are just hoping that everything returns to normalcy between India and Pakistan.”

In the ICC’s annual meeting, one of the top agenda is to control players’ behaviour in the wake of spot-fixing scandal during the third Test between South Africa and Australia, and Sethi believes it is a step in the right direction.

Sethi to leave for India to attend ICC meeting


"Cheating of any sort should be looked down upon. Strict measures should be taken to punish those indulging in cheating,” said Sethi. “Match-fixing, spot-fixing, ball-tampering are all instances of cheating. We should have very strict punishments for these. Therefore now the ICC should be taking strong measures against it. The current PCB takes a very dim view of any cheating, match-fixing and spot-fixing. We have already punished two or three players very severely. We take a very strong view. I hope and expect all other Boards will also strong view of such instances."

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ