Have diminishing returns set in for IK?

Published: February 9, 2018
SHARES
Email
Imran Khan. PHOTO COURTESY: PTI

Imran Khan. PHOTO COURTESY: PTI

pervez.tahir@tribune.com.pk Imran Khan. PHOTO COURTESY: PTI

Political outcomes, just like economic returns, are governed by the law of diminishing returns. Successive application of an input adds more and more units of output but not indefinitely. There is a point beyond which diminishing returns set in. It seems Imran Khan has reached that point. His was a single-input approach driven by the anti-corruption campaign. The slogan ‘Go Nawaz, go’ was designed to focus on what was perceived to be the most corrupt family rule. Predictably, the point of maximum return would be the exit of Nawaz. Dharna after dharna, jalsa after jalsa and, finally, court battle after court battle, there was a single-minded pursuit of this objective. Nawaz met his Waterloo on 28 July 2017. This is when diminishing returns set in for Imran Khan.

Suddenly there was nothing to do, as is the wont of one-point campaigners. The battle against corruption had been won, but before the Great War — the general elections. In the process, Imran ran out of ammunition. With his main weapon, the fight against corruption, now the property of the courts, offence offered no returns. There was no preparation for defence. When the questions of corruption were raised in his own backyard, Imran either kept quiet or let others offer lame excuses, forgetting what was done to the K-P Ehtisab Commissioner or to Election Commissioner in the party elections. It was pathetic to see the IK brigade at pains to explain that the use of official helicopter by IK was kosher and by others a corrupt practice. Nominating son to replace father and making campaign speeches by Tareen are OK with IK, but not by others. When it came to delivery in the child abuse cases, it turned out that the much-publicised K-P police were clueless until help arrived from Shehbaz Sharif’s ‘daakias’. His aides threw statistics and philosophised in response to simple questions asked by the media. It was just like a bureaucrat failing in his duty, with the difference that the latter never loses composure. There is no explanation of why jangla bus is bad in Punjab and good in K-P. Nor is there any understanding of the country’s energy policy and the kilowatt difference between the federal and provincial domains. The naivety in assuming that a billion trees could not be counted was appalling. In education, the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa government spent three years in learning what Punjab did in the very first year, despite the same teacher, ie, British DFID. The health sector has not even begun to heal. The list goes on. So does apologetics.

While the IK brigade, trained only for offence, is having to defend, it has brought upon itself the worst scenario of a ruling party roaring across the length and breadth of the country as if it were the opposition. IK has to carry the burden of incumbency in an election year. The hand-picked party organisation looks up to him to lead, unable as it is to organically change in response to a fast changing environment. He is lost and seeking solace in the world of metaphysics. He does not realise that the marriages of popular leaders are not a personal matter. The PTI does not have the resilience of a mass party. The middle class and youthful composition of the members and supporters raise the spectre of disillusionment. With a genetic imprint of the leader on the party, it is the leader who has to change. This, in the case of IK, is asking for the moon.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 9th, 2018.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (7)

  • Jade
    Feb 9, 2018 - 12:06PM

    PTI reached the point of diminishing returns in 2014 sit-ins. Since then, it has been a gradual decline. The reason for gradual decline is the lack of alternatives available to the people disenchanted with PTI’s politics style. Recommend

  • IMAAD UD DIN
    Feb 9, 2018 - 12:39PM

    Sick to economy doc, you have zero idea about politics. Waste of space.Recommend

  • Parvez
    Feb 9, 2018 - 1:59PM

    Excellent article ….. so the way I read it is that Imran Khan has to a great extent done his job and now the people of Pakistan are waiting for the other institutions to do theirs…and they seem to be dragging their feet or burying their heads in the sand because they too are major beneficiaries of the status quo.
    So, the question is ‘ Has Imran Khan failed ? ‘…… Answer is: It is still too early to tell. Recommend

  • Rehan
    Feb 9, 2018 - 9:41PM

    PTI voter is IK charisma follower. As logic does not prevail in the realm of love and charisma, his voter will remain unmoved whether IK delivers something or not.
    Unfortunate for Pakistan. Recommend

  • Haji Atiya
    Feb 9, 2018 - 10:34PM

    @Jade:
    Correct. Actually IK got a lucky break with the Panama Papers revelations and just hung tight to that to hammer in his one-point agenda of getting rid of Nawaz Sharif.Recommend

  • Sm
    Feb 10, 2018 - 5:25AM

    Waste of time and space. You know outing about politics yet wasting other’s time.Recommend

  • only truth is nature
    Feb 11, 2018 - 9:03AM

    Imran as yet needs to learn a lot.But he is the only choice we have.His good intention would supersede his weaknesses.Recommend

More in Opinion