Civil-military silence: Nation wants a civil government, says Asma

Takes jibe at ISPR for claiming their silence has a lot of meanings


Our Correspondent October 07, 2017
Asma Jahangir. PHOTO: ATHAR KHAN/EXPRESS

LAHORE: Former Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) president Asma Jahangir has said silence on behalf of the government and the military is dangerous, but circumstances have proven that the nation wants a civil government only.

“Attempts had been made in the past to make army chiefs heroes, but no one shed a single tear when former president General (retd) Pervez Musharraf and COAS General (retd) Raheel Sharif were sent home,” Asma told media-persons at the Lahore High Court Bar Association on Friday, in connection with the press conference of the Inter-Services Public Relations claiming their “silence has a lot of meanings”.

The former SCBA president said, “It means that the nation does not accept such people as heroes.”

Asma Jahangir censures SC

Asma said it has happened for the first time in the history of the country that Punjab voted against the establishment in the NA-120 by-election, sending a clear-cut message that they want a civil government only.

People of the constituency have decided to stand with the civil government, and not the establishment, Asma added.

‘Darkest day’ for judiciary: National security has trumped fundamental rights: Asma

She said it is the establishment that created political consciousness in the PML-N camp, adding that now every institution would have to work while remaining within its limits.

Giving a word of caution, she said politicians would have to rule with bravery if they want people’s support.

COMMENTS (11)

jawwad | 7 years ago | Reply Asma Jahangir.......A woman, bared with conscience, has always been cursed for whatever she stated.
Hassan Syed | 7 years ago | Reply Let's pray that Allah pulls us out from the catastrophe
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ