One force wants Karachi's development, the other its destruction: Farooq Sattar

MQM-P leader says Karachi generates 75% of country's revenue in taxes, but Centre gives it only 5% in return

News Desk August 13, 2017
Sattar laments on the ill-attention being paid to Karachi.

There are two forces at work in Karachi, one that wants its development and the other its destruction, Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) chief Dr Farooq Sattar said on Sunday.

"There are people [referring to his own party] who seek Karachi's development and then there are those who not only the want the city's destruction but are enemies of the entire country," the MQM-P leader said at the ExpoAbad event.

"Karachi generates 75 per cent of the country's revenue in taxes, but the federal government gives it only five per cent in return," he lamented.

Dr Sattar added that during his meeting with PM Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, the latter had admitted that the whole country relied on Karachi functioning smoothly.

The dark side of the apartment boom in Karachi

He went on to say that high-ranking officials were misappropriating billions of rupees and land grabbing was under way in the city.

"The residents of Karachi have been putting up with this but won’t tolerate it any longer," he added.

"We haven't taken to the streets yet but it's time that we let the rulers know how much we have suffered."

Media talk: We need to develop Karachi: mayor 

The MQM-P leader said most residents of the city lived in slums and needed affordable housing schemes but the incumbent government had done nothing to make that happen.

He also criticised the government for the water shortage in the city, warning that this issue could turn into a major dispute.

Facebook Conversations


Imran Qadri | 2 years ago | Reply | Recommend His own party encroached public parks,play grounds and amenity plots and illegally turned them into housing projects and commercial markets.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Load Next Story